Why is it that brothers overshadow eachother so much in boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Slyboots
    MarGODito
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 4230
    • 192
    • 248
    • 20,911

    #1

    Why is it that brothers overshadow eachother so much in boxing?

    The only brothers in boxing that I'm aware of who are simultaneously popular are the Klitchkos.

    I never really hear much coverage of Bobby Pacquiao, Matthew Hatton or Jose Miguel Cotto. I would think because of the popularity of their brothers, they would inherit some of it too. Or is it because they're so popular they completely overshadow them?

    Am I wrong to think this? If not, are there any other brothers in boxing that share this situation?
  • xzworks
    Randy Suico Fan
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2005
    • 1847
    • 260
    • 333
    • 12,107

    #2
    marquez brothers are both great..............

    Comment

    • miron_lang
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2004
      • 4187
      • 1,389
      • 1,727
      • 18,862

      #3
      Juan Manuel and Rafael Marquez. The Greatest brother act in boxing history - Larry Merchant


      * Not the exact quote :I

      Comment

      • The Dreamer
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 1138
        • 89
        • 106
        • 7,576

        #4
        Originally posted by Slyboots
        The only brothers in boxing that I'm aware of who are simultaneously popular are the Klitchkos.

        I never really hear much coverage of Bobby Pacquiao, Matthew Hatton or Jose Miguel Cotto. I would think because of the popularity of their brothers, they would inherit some of it too. Or is it because they're so popular they completely overshadow them?

        Am I wrong to think this? If not, are there any other brothers in boxing that share this situation?
        Their popularity has something to do with their talent. The Klitchkos are simultaneously popular because they're both good. So are Rafa and JMM.

        Bobby Pacquiao, Matthew Hatton, Jose Miguel Cotto, not so much compared to their more talented brothers. So it's more of the talent of their brothers that overshadows them, and with that comes the popularity.

        Comment

        • Fox McCloud
          Mission Complete!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 18176
          • 789
          • 1,151
          • 26,037

          #5
          Originally posted by Slyboots
          The only brothers in boxing that I'm aware of who are simultaneously popular are the Klitchkos.

          I never really hear much coverage of Bobby Pacquiao, Matthew Hatton or Jose Miguel Cotto. I would think because of the popularity of their brothers, they would inherit some of it too. Or is it because they're so popular they completely overshadow them?

          Am I wrong to think this? If not, are there any other brothers in boxing that share this situation?
          Peterson brothers are about equally good.
          As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, the Marquez brothers are kind of boss.

          Comment

          • Slyboots
            MarGODito
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2009
            • 4230
            • 192
            • 248
            • 20,911

            #6
            I dunno how I forgot about the Marquezssszs.

            Either way, I think Raf's popularity is still a bit overshadowed by JMM's.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP