open challenge-please talk through round by rou nd how dirrell beat froch..

**STEELHEAD** · 11-08-2009, 07:09 PM

doubt if you get any responce.
they know its just idle talk they been spouting.

**Sir Tom Jones** · 11-08-2009, 07:10 PM

**Kalion** · 11-08-2009, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

I find this halarious that these seething yanks and calslappe bumboys claim that froch lost tthe fight. Link m the youtube videos and show me roud by round how he lost..please do tell me...

Ill leave you with a video with the top american boxing youtube pundit and how he scored it....or did he say this so theres no controversy for the super 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo

That fights old news,

I will talk you through point by point why Froch sucks though...

**slimshandy69** · 11-08-2009, 07:23 PM

Originally posted by Kalion

That fights old news,

I will talk you through point by point why Froch sucks though...

the rounds are all on youtube..most top media pundits had froch wining but the calsppe bumboys and some of the idiotic yanks claim dirrell was robbed..

S this is there moment to dissect, another to do with old news..

If people on here even though ive proved otherwise, then they can show me from round 1 and 2(where dirrell literally didnt throw a punch to round 12 why dirrell won..

Good luck...its called a challenge...

**S A M U R A I** · 11-08-2009, 07:33 PM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

the rounds are all on youtube..most top media pundits had froch wining but the calsppe bumboys and some of the idiotic yanks claim dirrell was robbed..

S this is there moment to dissect, another to do with old news..

If people on here even though ive proved otherwise, then they can show me from round 1 and 2(where dirrell literally didnt throw a punch to round 12 why dirrell won..

Good luck...its called a challenge...

What's the ****ing point bro? We already broke the fight down numerous times and you still disagreed with us.

"Us" being about 80% of boxing fans who saw Froch lose to a prospect.

This thread should be ignored. Why? Because it makes no difference to the outcome, and it makes no difference to you. You're here only because you are an attention whore and for the sake sticking up for your favorite fighter. Personally, I have no motivation to converse with you, nor any motivation to try changing your mind, because you are a stubborn jackass who thinks he's always right, but in reality is far too narrow-minded and dumb to see anyone else's point of view.

So, on that note, feel free to go **** yourself.

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

**jdubb863** · 11-08-2009, 07:39 PM

Im American and i have to admit the fight was close but i do think Froch won... I DO NOT like Froch and i do think he SUCKS so much but im not Biased and i think he won.

I thought it was so dumb how peaple compared Haye-Valuev to Froch-Dirrell... Valuev was not putting on effective pressure like Froch was. Valuev was plodding foward and Froch was running at dirrell swinging. BAD COMPARISON.

**Kalion** · 11-08-2009, 07:41 PM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

the rounds are all on youtube..most top media pundits had froch wining but the calsppe bumboys and some of the idiotic yanks claim dirrell was robbed..

S this is there moment to dissect, another to do with old news..

If people on here even though ive proved otherwise, then they can show me from round 1 and 2(where dirrell literally didnt throw a punch to round 12 why dirrell won..

Good luck...its called a challenge...

Like I said, the fight is old news. Couldve went either way.

But I will thouroughly explain why Carl froch sucks though.

**slimshandy69** · 11-08-2009, 07:42 PM

Originally posted by S a m u r a i

What's the ****ing point bro? We already broke the fight down numerous times and you still disagreed with us.

"Us" being about 80% of boxing fans who saw Froch lose to a prospect.

This thread should be ignored. Why? Because it makes no difference to the outcome, and it makes no difference to you. You're here only because you are an attention whore and for the sake sticking up for your favorite fighter. Personally, I have no motivation to converse with you, nor any motivation to try changing your mind, because you are a stubborn jackass who thinks he's always right, but in reality is far too narrow-minded and dumb to see anyone else's point of view.

So, on that note, feel free to go **** yourself.

the bigragu an unbiased american who knows his boxing and has seen more live events than you scored it to froch..he did a round by round break down...

Allan green scored it to froch by 3 rounds..

boxing scene scored it to froch..

Buncey on primetime scored it to froch..

Showtime didnt complain..and admitted froch won..

the ringside press scored it to froch..

the foreign judges scored it to froch..

Ea5t5ide boxing forums scored it to froch...

Even gary shaw ffs admitted they didnt do enough to get a decisoon, so please show me via youtube and point put the times and talk through how dirrell beat froch...

otherwise you have bottled it...

**slimshandy69** · 11-08-2009, 07:44 PM

Originally posted by jdubb863

Im American and i have to admit the fight was close but i do think Froch won... I DO NOT like Froch and i do think he SUCKS so much but im not Biased and i think he won.

I thought it was so dumb how peaple compared Haye-Valuev to Froch-Dirrell... Valuev was not putting on effective pressure like Froch was. Valuev was plodding foward and Froch was running at dirrell swinging. BAD COMPARISON.

exactly...i not asking people to like froch..you can hope he dies for all i care..i just want trueful posts like this...

open challenge-please talk through round by rou nd how dirrell beat froch..