chris henry would ktfo froch...

**WhoreUs** · 11-08-2009, 06:48 PM

the running back?

i don't think he can make 168.

**Guest** · 11-08-2009, 06:49 PM

Yusak Mack handled Chris Henry on ESPN.

I don't think he's that good really.

**The Monk** · 11-08-2009, 06:53 PM

Great topic....

....naaaaaat!

**daggum** · 11-08-2009, 06:56 PM

Originally posted by jreckoning

Yusak Mack handled Chris Henry on ESPN.

I don't think he's that good really.

handled a controversial SD win? and i think that's the point. he's not very good and he would probably still win.

**nujabes77** · 11-08-2009, 07:00 PM

Originally posted by road bully

the running back?

i don't think he can make 168.

i think he can but if not, p4p who do you think takes it?

Originally posted by jreckoning

Yusak Mack handled Chris Henry on ESPN.

I don't think he's that good really.

and you think froch is any better?

**Guest** · 11-08-2009, 07:05 PM

Originally posted by daggum

handled a controversial SD win? and i think that's the point. he's not very good and he would probably still win.

I thought Mack clearly won the fight.

Hard to say with Froch.

Henry didn't look that great overseas either.

**TheGreatA** · 11-08-2009, 07:07 PM

Originally posted by jreckoning

Yusak Mack handled Chris Henry on ESPN.

I don't think he's that good really.

He can be outboxed, quite easily in fact. Henry is a sitting target for right hands, only his chin has saved him from being knocked out.

Froch wouldn't be trying to box him though. A brawl between the two could go either way.

**WhoreUs** · 11-08-2009, 07:07 PM

Originally posted by pacman777

i think he can but if not, p4p who do you think takes it?

henry is more athletic. definitely stronger and faster (running wise)

but chris henry has never boxed in his life , he's a football player , so he and froch should be on the same boxing skill level.

chris henry would ktfo froch...