Who is a more exciting fighter? Hopkins or Dawson?

**Iceta** · 11-08-2009, 12:05 AM

Anybody want to comment?

**Freddy Krueger** · 11-08-2009, 12:07 AM

They both do this to my eyes. And no I'm not the kid in this picture. I just took a better look at him and that kid might have downs. And I do not!

**Iceta** · 11-08-2009, 12:13 AM

Hopkins does it for me. The proof is in the pudding. Look at how he dominated Tarver in a clinic and made it enjoyable to watch. The only thing he did to make the fight a little ugly was clinch quite a bit to sap Tarver's energy. He also got hit less than Chad did against Tarver. And beat stop a better version of Glen Johnson on top of it.

**The Hammer** · 11-08-2009, 12:21 AM

"Neither" is the correct answer.

Tavoris Cloud is probably the most exciting light heavyweight.

**JmH Reborn** · 11-08-2009, 12:21 AM

Hopkins is alot more enjoyable for me...I happen to appreciate the grimey aspect of boxing. The rough housing techniques. The only dirty tactic I disapprove of is rabbit punches and ****.

Either way, Hopkins is 44 years old and methodically breaks down his opponents...they aren't always the most exciting, but they are awesome.

Dawson just disappoints me...I enjoy awesome boxing display, I just believe the younger lions should be alot more aggressive. He's too passive and when his skills start to dwindle, he will get beat down

Who is a more exciting fighter? Hopkins or Dawson?