Originally posted by paul750
What you're basically saying with your argument, is that McCall was at Lewis's level as a fighter. It's either that or he had his number. If that was the case, McCall would have gotten down to work in the rematch, done his thing. He didn't.
If you want to lay down woeful tales of mental fragility then you're guilty of not judging a fighter by his actual achievements. I can relate, I've been doing the same thing with a shot Mike Tyson for the past 9 years.
McCall's track record doesn't back up your point of view as far as him being on Lewis's level as a fighter goes. The fact that he couldn't repeat the win would suggest he didn't have Lewis's number, so you're left with only one logical conclusion - McCall got lucky, it was that 1 in 10 shot that I'd give to several fighters of Lewis's era.
David Tua is a good name to mention, an iron-chinned, big punching fighter who on several occassions managed to overcome more skilled fighters than himself through sheer punching power. I'd say Tua falls into the same category as McCall, capable of knocking out Lewis once if they had 10 fights to do so.
Comment