I love this decision because it finally proves Brits don't know **** about boxing

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • S A M U R A I
    Bulletproof
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 181694
    • 1,495
    • 1,324
    • 1,419,318

    #31
    Originally posted by BOX-A-LOT
    It's not so much that it proves the Brits don't know **** about boxing, but it really shows their biased.
    They are no more biased than anyone else.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

    Comment

    • steeluv
      Interim Champion
      • Jul 2009
      • 969
      • 39
      • 76
      • 7,167

      #32
      Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
      Froch-Dirrell
      Valuev-Haye

      The only difference is that Dirrell not only made Froch miss, but Dirrell beat the **** out of Froch down the stretch.

      It's funny that limeys need two bogus decisions to even make a peep in the boxing world.
      How can you say Direll won and then someone who does pretty much the same tactics but landing more effectively, without hugging that makes judges and fans get pissed off with ur dude direll and even knock a point of ur dude. Plus Haye didn't get hurt at all like direll did at all the 6th round in the direll fight Direll wa holding on as his legs had gone. Go look at the compubox stats on the two fights and u will see that Haye won much more comfortably than Direll could have, even without looking at his anti boxing hugging like it was not a boxing match but it was his long lost mother at every opportunity.

      Comment

      • S A M U R A I
        Bulletproof
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 181694
        • 1,495
        • 1,324
        • 1,419,318

        #33
        Originally posted by steeluv
        How can you say Direll won and then someone who does pretty much the same tactics but landing more effectively, without hugging that makes judges and fans get pissed off with ur dude direll and even knock a point of ur dude. Plus Haye didn't get hurt at all like direll did at all the 6th round in the direll fight Direll wa holding on as his legs had gone. Go look at the compubox stats on the two fights and u will see that Haye won much more comfortably than Direll could have, even without looking at his anti boxing hugging like it was not a boxing match but it was his long lost mother at every opportunity.
        Where are the compubox stats for Froch-Dirrell? There aren't any, I thought? It was a Showtime event, not HBO.



        100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

        Comment

        • Sick/
          Banned
          • Feb 2009
          • 11284
          • 554
          • 866
          • 14,892

          #34
          Originally posted by OneEyeOpen
          Froch-Dirrell
          Valuev-Haye

          The only difference is that Dirrell not only made Froch miss, but Dirrell beat the **** out of Froch down the stretch.

          It's funny that limeys need two bogus decisions to even make a peep in the boxing world.
          ****** ****

          Comment

          • daggum
            All time great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 43829
            • 4,715
            • 3
            • 166,270

            #35
            yep we finally got the brits trapped in hypocrite land.

            if haye won why didn't dirrell against froch or hopkins against calzaghe. i'd say they were both more impressive than haye but now they rewrite the rules to scoring a fight cause the british fighter landed the better punches while backing up. um um errr well ya see yea but but what happened was......CAUGHT!

            Comment

            • boxasmash
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 7039
              • 222
              • 63
              • 14,591

              #36
              Calzaghe has more ENGLISH haters then American haters. True story.

              Comment

              • project xxx1
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 12868
                • 764
                • 1,289
                • 22,511

                #37
                Originally posted by Check
                I don't really want to piss the Brits off too much, but I think they are the most nationalistic country. I know it goes both ways(we have some crazy American nuthuggers) but British fans will say their guy won or make an excuse as to why their guy lost. I think a lot of them realize Dirrell won the fight, especially now but they can't retrace their words and are stuck with saying Froch still won. Americas success in boxing has really chapped their asses and they must be completely behind their guys.
                agree with you to a certian extent,we do back up our fighters but sometimes the amercians think we no nothing about boxing and we just support our boxers blind,but thats not the case,if someone is good then you admire them and if not then be fair.yea ill be the 1st to admitt the amercians are better boxers 70 percent of the time and they fight better competition because they have more options in the states but it does annoy me when amercians say that brits no nothing about boxing when we stay up till 4 in the morning just to watch the big fights.i like alot of the amercians boxers and also boxers from other countries.froch did loose his fight to dirrell but haye won and thats fair

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP