People who compare Valuev to Froch are a ****ing disgrace...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • W1LL
    Celtic Warrior
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 11851
    • 845
    • 916
    • 71,119

    #1

    People who compare Valuev to Froch are a ****ing disgrace...

    ... bunch of bitter, arrogant, sore losers. Clearest sign of Yanks turning this into a nationality thing in a long while, and yet they claim it's all the Brits doing. Yeah right, you got about 20 world champions of your own so why you gotta be so bitter when ours do the job?
  • Check
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 16585
    • 677
    • 132
    • 26,287

    #2
    Because it wasn't the right thing to do. Haye did the damn thing and deserved the win but so did Andre. Andre boxed even more beautifully and even landed many more cleaner blows. Both Andre and David deserved to win the belts because they boxed a smart fight. Both used the ring and made their opponents look they were fighting underwater. They were similar fights and if you liked Hayes style of fighting you most certainly had to have Andre way up in the cards as well. Even if you couldn't stand Andres moving he did out class Froch with the crisper, cleaner and more effective blows.

    Comment

    • W1LL
      Celtic Warrior
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2004
      • 11851
      • 845
      • 916
      • 71,119

      #3
      Dirrell hugged and clinched every chance he got, got a point deducted, looked for any chance he could to ***** and moan and spent the first half of the fight looking like he'd been sentenced to death. Froch also landed ALOT more than Valuev.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP