so Froch fans, what did Haye do that Dirrell didn't do?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shadeyfizzle
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 7448
    • 160
    • 43
    • 13,959

    #21
    Originally posted by 2501
    Just curious as I'm seeing so many Froch fans boasting about Haye's win. Dirrell landed more than Haye did BTW.
    Im not a fan of either guy but I found Haye more entertaining than Dirrell.

    Comment

    • sunny31
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 5780
      • 450
      • 35
      • 128,703

      #22
      haye won, dirrell also won they hit and didn't get hit back as much, and also did more damage on the other fighter, and in both cases stunned them.

      Comment

      • Jan(DK)
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Feb 2007
        • 379
        • 21
        • 0
        • 6,444

        #23
        Originally posted by Bhopreign
        Youre a clown, you do this every fight, you bet on Dirrell and Valuev to win, when they lose you act like you were for the other guy the whole time, are you delusional?
        The guy just lose 350K betting on the wrong fighter to win. If he praise the winner then - i.l guess he agrees on who won...........

        Comment

        • krazyn8tive
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 7970
          • 714
          • 996
          • 37,433

          #24
          Originally posted by pcr405
          Haye landed far better shots on valuev then dirrel did on froch.
          With the exception of the punch that had Valuev doing the two step, dirrell landed way more clean and effective shots that haye did. Watch the fights before you comment. Dirrell landed a HUGE left on Froch that had him retreating late but yet couldn't finish him off. Dirrell is a whiny little ***** but he was landing more often and more effectively over the course of the whole fight.

          Comment

          • BoxCleva
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 1226
            • 80
            • 7
            • 7,473

            #25
            I had Dirrell winning against Froch for pretty much the same reason Haye won against Valuev.

            Comment

            • black.ink
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 4214
              • 213
              • 165
              • 19,555

              #26
              I'm a Froch fan that thought the Dirrell fight could have gone either way depending how you look at it. Dirrell by 2 rounds is my personal opinion. Hard fight to judge.

              Difference is, Haye did not hold every chance he got, and Froch actually wanted to fight, whereas Valuev didn't look like trying at times.

              Not all of us Froch fans are delusional you know.

              Comment

              • CiganoBoxer
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 2286
                • 566
                • 692
                • 8,802

                #27
                Originally posted by 2501
                Just curious as I'm seeing so many Froch fans boasting about Haye's win. Dirrell landed more than Haye did BTW.
                Haye didnt hold on like a sailor holding on to a mast in a bad storm lol
                That being said i had Dirrel beating froch....but please lets move on

                Comment

                • Ray*
                  Be safe!!!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 44867
                  • 1,654
                  • 1,608
                  • 558,890

                  #28
                  Originally posted by black.ink
                  I'm a Froch fan that thought the Dirrell fight could have gone either way depending how you look at it. Dirrell by 2 rounds is my personal opinion. Hard fight to judge.

                  Difference is, Haye did not hold every chance he got, and Froch actually wanted to fight, whereas Valuev didn't look like trying at times.

                  Not all of us Froch fans are delusional you know.


                  Thats the thing, I scored the fight to Dirrell also by 2 points but like i said i was glad he didnt get the decision, There is a difference between running,hugging,crying/complaining at every opportunity, Haye doesnt have the advantages that Dirrell had against Froch.

                  Dirrell lost that fight more than Froch winning it for me

                  Comment

                  • Drunk Punch
                    In Asia
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 5823
                    • 172
                    • 130
                    • 12,619

                    #29
                    Look Dirrell /Froch was close. Hence the SD. But last night Valuev landed nothing, and Haye picked his shots.

                    Comment

                    • Spray_resistant
                      Vacant interim regular(C)
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 29972
                      • 3,112
                      • 1,622
                      • 53,384

                      #30
                      Haye wasn't manhandled, flailing around, or intentionally falling to the canvas to avoid inside fighting.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP