If you had Haye winning you best of had Dirrell winning

[Check]

Haye won his fight and so did Dirrell. Brits better not have a double standard, simply because Haye is a Brit.

[P.WILL]

i had dirrell-froch 117-110 Dirrell
ill wait to score haye-valuev on youtube

[The_Visitation]

Both were very close fights that could have gone either way. Nobody was robbed, and nobody would have been robbed had the winners been Dirrell and Valuev.

End of.

[starjammer]

Yep its so true and a real exposure. Dirrell was wayyyy more dominating, impressive and aggressive. Plus Froch landed less than Valuev hehe

[hammerhiem]

I did as i happens, by the same score too.

[..WaRSpencE..]

Dirrell beat the **** outta Froch..I don't see how anybody could have scored it otherwise..

[letsgobrady]

Haye won his fight and so did Dirrell. Brits better not have a double standard, simply because Haye is a Brit.

i'm not a brit but i thought both fights were hard to score and both fights could have gone either way

[Sergio Martinez]

Yes Dirrel did beat Froch, but the Froch Dirrell fight was closer than Haye/Valuev.

[Hyde]

id say the yanks have double standards for saying Dirrell won and Valuev won, lets face it most people on here that says Valuev won is americans or famous klitschko nuthugging haye haters like klitschko2009 or tunney(carnivore).

I had Dirrell and Haye winning simply because they LANDED MORE and boxed better and got hit alot less, that my folks is called BOXING.

this is not streetfighting, this is a sport and both Dirrell and Haye did whats in the rules of boxing to win. to hit and not get hit.

[SplitSecond]

Yes Dirrel did beat Froch, but the Froch Dirrell fight was closer than Haye/Valuev.

not really....