Cant compare Froch-Dirrell to Valuev-Haye

**Kalion** · 11-07-2009, 06:24 PM

Originally posted by tehMatrix

first off, haye was literally fighting a giant and you could see valuev's weight was just to much when he came in and just rest on david

dirrell tho, he did'nt have to run, but that still does'nt change the fact that he won

btw, this is boxin peeps, we use our advantage, it's not trying to be more macho than the other guy, it's gracefully utilizing the art of pugilism and hitting and not get hit

haye is usually an entertaining watch, you CANNOT judge him on this fight as he was not gonna win any other way

peace.

Yeah cause Froch vs Dirrell was much better.

**SplitSecond** · 11-07-2009, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by Kalion

Yeah cause Froch vs Dirrell was much better.

who said Dirrell-Froch was any better?(which is was)
all i said was Dirrell did'nt have to circle, potshot and come in with the occasional combo
Haye 'DID'

Dirrell got robbed
but tonight i think the right man won

**Boxing Scene** · 11-07-2009, 06:27 PM

Oh now it's because Valuev is so tall. What about Holyfield whipping that tall ass?

**broxi51** · 11-07-2009, 06:30 PM

froch hit dirrell more than valuev did haye plus valuev. plus haye didn't hold like a ***** the way dirrell did. valuev did the old chicken dance plus there was a few times he felt the power, would,nt say buzzed but you knew when he was shaking the head he felt the power of haye alright.

if he did win the fight with damaged hand, no reason to doubt since he won the fight, props to him even more. props also for only getting caught in the clinch a couple times.

**SplitSecond** · 11-07-2009, 06:31 PM

did'nt haye hurt his right hand in the second round?
and i did'nt watch holyfield-valuev, was that exciting and dominating?

Cant compare Froch-Dirrell to Valuev-Haye