Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Worst Resume Jones Or Hopkins?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by daggum View Post
    not many people respect calzaghe's girly fighting style and he's only more well known cause he's the guy with the girly fighting style.
    seen as the best super middle weight, Enough said,

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by SilverSamurai View Post
      A lot of boxers try to fight at as low a weight class as possible. Both Eubank and Calzaghe were natural cws and Hopkins was a natural lhw. I personally would be in favor of bringing back the same day weigh in rule, but that will never happen now.

      We are going to have to disagree on the Hopkins/Calzaghe outcome, which was a messy fight. No way should Hopkins of been allowed to get away with so much clinching and headbutting.

      As for a Ottke/Calzaghe match, I read (on this site) that Ottke wasn't interested.
      no way calzaghe should have been allowed to get away with so much clinching, lowblows, and rabbit punching. the raping was fine.

      yes calzaghe didn't want to fight ottke in germany cause germany focuses on clean accurate punching when they judge and punishes sloppy inaccurate boxing. ottke didn't want to fight calzaghe in the uk cause he would get stopped manfredo style.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Sir Tom Jones View Post
        seen as the best super middle weight, Enough said,
        the division is only 20 years old and how many people actually stayed in the division for their entire careers? only ottke and calzaghe lol so take your pick. i pick ottke cause of his smooth boxing style, accurate punching and great defense. you pick calzaghe cause he does the opposite.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          no way calzaghe should have been allowed to get away with so much clinching, lowblows, and rabbit punching. the raping was fine.

          yes calzaghe didn't want to fight ottke in germany cause germany focuses on clean accurate punching when they judge and punishes sloppy inaccurate boxing. ottke didn't want to fight calzaghe in the uk cause he would get stopped manfredo style.
          I don't remember Calzaghe hitting him low on purpose, when he did hit him low it was at worst around the belly button. Hopkins should of got an award for the acting though, top stuff.

          The raping was fine?
          lmao

          From what I remember, didn't Ottke get a lot of dubious decisions in Germany? The only fight of his I saw was the Reid fight and that at best was a joke. Reid got a warning for punching Ottke and constant warnings for headbutts, when it was Ottke that was causing them by charging in headfirst to clinch.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            the division is only 20 years old and how many people actually stayed in the division for their entire careers? only ottke and calzaghe lol so take your pick. i pick ottke cause of his smooth boxing style, accurate punching and great defense. you pick calzaghe cause he does the opposite.
            Are you a fan of Ottke?

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by daggum View Post
              yes calzaghe didn't want to fight ottke in germany cause germany focuses on clean accurate punching when they judge and punishes sloppy inaccurate boxing.
              That's hilarious.



              100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by SilverSamurai View Post
                Are you a fan of Ottke?
                He is Ottke. He is the only one who cares about him.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Benjamin_arris View Post
                  Calzaghes resume is CLEARLY better and he beat them both. Choose between Hopkins or Jones you silly ****sucker
                  .....you aint too old for forum name callin'?!?.....well I am!!......Bless!!

                  and for the record......you comin' across as a ******* the way you kick the thread off.....so expect dudes to kick you back with ******* type responses.....ya dig!!.....be easy my dude!!

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Shattered Jaw View Post
                    Jones has the far superior record (Toney, Griffin, Hill, McCallum, (Hopkins himself), Ruiz). He also moved up (and through) twice as many weights as Hopkins.
                    i would just add to your nitpicking off hopkins record and add about the so called p4p king of the 90's toney was dead at the weight...ruiz is universally recognized as 1 of the worst heavyweight champions in years...mcCallum was 40years old wasnt he.

                    to say jones is better because he moved up more divisions is also rubbish...hopkins beat every single middleweight contender/champion of his era and then when you say the bigger fighters he fought he lost to...its upto you whether you think taylor deserved both decisions...but calzaghe DID NOT deserve the decision at all...what about tarver pavlik they werent smaller

                    hopkins cleaned and dominated the division for over 10years...jones nitpicked and carefully moved through divisions never fighting the best

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Deja vu. Been done to death.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP