I see her suit to get $150,000 as quite normal. As the widow, she's entitled to get a reasonable sum every so often for running expenses. Especially since she's the sole heir.
I believe the judge's ruling was wrong.
On another point, it's standard ruling, in every country, I believe to nullify every previous will on marriage. I'm assuming this will comes under the jurisdiction of the United States.
I can't see the family winning with a 1907 will, which probably dates from before Gatti and his wife even had met.
My feeling is, that unless they prove the will a forgery, or that Gatti was subject to "undue influence" or the wife was involved in a crime resulting in Gatti's death, she will win.
As Gatti was a mature adult, able to earn $6 mill, and sane, he had full freedom to make her his heir, regardless of what presure she is suposed to have put o him. He had the mind to make his own decisions, and "love" ons/or the losing of his wife if he didn't sign is not, repeat, not regarded as undue influence.
Certainly not sufficient to invalidate a legally drawn up will.
He has a 6 million dollar estate aswell. Asset rich maybe.
yeah i hope the judge dont feel sorry for her ass because shes a woman and i hope she loses her case..**** that ***** how can she think about the money when the great boxing warrior aturo gatti is dead..**** that hoe
Never know for sure what happened, but she does sound a bit dodgy. But it wont kill her by not giving him all his money, so the judge should air on caution.
Criminals should never prosper. Even if she dont get no money, she will never starve i would think. Perhaps the judge should give her some money but dont do go overboard.
Comment