Has Cotto or Pacquiao fought the better competition as of late?

[Freddy Krueger]

Poll is not public, do not be afraid to cast your vote


Hatton/Clottey

Diaz/Jennings

Oscar/Margarito

[El Angel]

Poll is not public, do not be afraid to cast your vote


Hatton/Clottey

Diaz/Jennings

Oscar/Margarito

Clottey is better than Hatton. Diaz is better than Jennings. Margarito is better than the version of De La Hoya that Pacquiao fought. That's IMO. Or did Pac make them look bad and Cotto make them look good? I think Cotto has fought the better competition, but it is a interesting question.

[Sin City]

cotto has fought the harder comp.

[bigboss1]

cotto hands down

[MaD RoBoT]

comparing cotto's comp on his own division over Pac's 1 or 2 divisions higher?

[-Boxzilla-]

i voted even too quickly ... thinking about it i would go with cotto

[-EX-]

Cotto...Clottey's better than Hatton...Diaz and Jennings both are nothing special...DLH was washed up and appeared drained...Margarito isn't that good but he's better than that DLH...

[The Hammer]

Clottey is tougher than Hatton, the rest is about even, so Cotto has fought better opposition.

[miron_lang]

Before the actual fight.


Hatton > Clottey
Diaz = Jennings
Oscar> Marg


After

Hatton < Clottey
Diaz = Jennings
Oscar < Marg

[Syf]

Before the actual fight.


Hatton > Clottey
Diaz = Jennings
Oscar> Marg


After

Hatton < Clottey
Diaz = Jennings
Oscar < Marg

nail on head.

I think the manner in which Pac defeated his last three opponents has lowered their value in a lot of boxing fans' eyes.

Meanwhile, Cotto has had some drawn out wars, and made his opponents look very good.

Its all murky whether as a previous poster said, Cotto made his opponents look good and manny made his look bad... or that Cotto has fought harder comp..

No way to tell really, until the 14th