Why the hype of wining a title in 7 divisions?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
If this ain't a bait/hate thread, I don't know what is.
In any case, if you don't think it's a big deal to win 7 titles, I don't care who's doing it, you are not a boxing fan. Someone's stan maybe?Comment
-
I give Pacquiao for his wins in other divisions this one...idk
The fight is at a catchweight...and a diamond belt? That's ******ed...
But I will give him a lotta credit if he beats Cotto...I hope the weight doesn't affect Miguel tho so that can't be something to take away from the win...
But I hope Cotto spanks him
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
lets see, these were the traditionals:
* Flyweight (Maximum 112 pounds)
* Bantamweight (118)
* Featherweight (126)
* Lightweight (135)
* Welterweight (147)
* Middleweight (160)
* Light Heavyweight (175)
* Heavyweight (unlimited)
for a guy that started at 106, he would have been in 5 which it would have been a LOT back in the days. The problem would have been the sanctioning bodies. Instead of having 4 belts, it was only one so becoming champion was much harder. Now a guy like PAC could have still gotten 112/118/126/135(this one pushing it) so that's a potential for 2-4 belts and if he was crazy enough to go up to 147 and get a belt that would have been insane.
Now Cotto is the No1 WW in my eyes, so regardless if is at 145 instead of 147 it is still a HUGE deal. But as u can see those 7 divisions would not have been 3Comment
-
Comment

Comment