Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lennox Lewis: Great or Goat?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Runw/knives
    I would like to point out:
    G.O.A.T. is an acryonym for "Greatest of All Time". The other option was great, and the topic starter did not choose either.

    Lennox Lewis: "Great or Not Great".
    the title of this post ("Lennox Lewis: Great or Goat?") was meant to be an eye-catcher that expresses the range of perceived worth or greatness (or lack thereof) of Lennox Lewis. opinions can fall anywhere along the gamut between great and goat. responders can say he's "swell" or he's a "cold fish". whatever pleases.

    i am aware of the Greatest of all time acronym (G.O.A.T.). There's only one of those. don't be confused...G.O.A.T. is not an option when talking about Lennox Lewis. no disrespect to the former champ, but anyone saying he's the greatest of all times must be a relative.

    i didn't express my opinion using the words "great" or "goat" per se, but i did give my opinion: I don't think he was all that great. further, he was a good heavyweight. to me, his performances in the ring didn't warrant the "great" moniker. Ali was great. he would've embarrassed Lewis.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Kimmy
      I`m not saying it in a bad way. I think Guys like Tyson, Judah and Corrales should be shot and hung for their wicked actions in ( and out ) the ring. My point was that Lewis will never be considered a top five heavyweight because he had no personaility and was very arrogrant towards his opponents. Not saying he`s a villian, just saying he wasn`t very human and one couldn`t relate to him. Thats why allot of fans didn`t like him!
      i cant write it better. i like ll like a boxer he is great in the ring he dont cheat, but outside, before the fight he cant pr its nothing interesting about him. sort of its good for his own, he quite on top dont use drugs etc not like tyson,holy,ali. and when tyson fight everybody talk about it even if tyson is not as good as ll. and what is wrong to have different woman?, if you got money and afford to have kids why not?. and holyfield,tyson also looks better/harder whatever you want to call it than ll

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by kapersky
        , he quite on top dont use drugs etc not like tyson,holy,ali.
        Are you saying Muhammed Ali, and Evander Holyfield use drugs?



        Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Runw/knives
          Are you saying Muhammed Ali, and Evander Holyfield use drugs?
          no but tyson did, maybe i should explain and write it clearly next time , ali dont quite on top holyfield also

          Comment


          • #25
            I love how people try and link a fighters personality to his ability to fight.

            88 Olympic Gold Medal
            3 Time Heavyweight Champion(Only Ali and Holyfield did this)
            16 Title defenses(3rd all time behind Loius and Holmes)

            If you can look at that record and say that fighter wasn't great then your a hater plain and simple.

            As far as him saying his opponents got lucky, please show me some proof that proves him wrong. Someone tried to say Lewis won the McCall rematch only because McCall broke, down, but ignore the fact that Lewis was in complete controll of the fight up until that point.

            and do we even need to talk about what happend in the Rahman rematch?

            How is he not a "good human being". Someone please give me examples im begging you.

            Evander Holyfield is 10x more imoral than Lewis and I never hear him brought up.

            Comment


            • #26
              Lennox Lewis sucks. I heard that Marvis Frazier sucker punched him and KHTFO at a "Save the Children" fundraiser in Berkley, CA.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by jose
                I love how people try and link a fighters personality to his ability to fight.

                88 Olympic Gold Medal
                3 Time Heavyweight Champion(Only Ali and Holyfield did this)
                16 Title defenses(3rd all time behind Loius and Holmes)

                If you can look at that record and say that fighter wasn't great then your a hater plain and simple.

                As far as him saying his opponents got lucky, please show me some proof that proves him wrong. Someone tried to say Lewis won the McCall rematch only because McCall broke, down, but ignore the fact that Lewis was in complete controll of the fight up until that point.

                and do we even need to talk about what happend in the Rahman rematch?

                How is he not a "good human being". Someone please give me examples im begging you.

                Evander Holyfield is 10x more imoral than Lewis and I never hear him brought up.
                Great post Jose

                Comment


                • #28
                  GREAT.

                  Simple as that. Bowe avoided him, throw out any qualms about Lewis not fighting Bowe...Rid**** went as far as to embarrass himself and boxing by dumping that belt in the trash b/c he was so scared.

                  The prime debate is endless...he beat Holy twice but people say Evander was done; he beat a shot Tyson, sure, but he did beat a prime Tua, destroyed Ruddock (whom Tyson struggled against more than a little), a prime prospect (inexperience granted but ALOT of people picked the upset) in Grant, destoyed Golota, defeated solid fighters who would be HUGE challenges for today's heavies in Morrison, Briggs, and Akinwande. This is a solid resume, and it's not his fault that he was avoided like the plague in the early 90s.

                  Sure, he avoided Byrd, but he was all about taking on the young guns (Grant, Tua, Kirk Johnson--injury of course stopped that fight) who many deemed worthy of title shots. Then he steps in under trained against an incredibly motivated Vitali and rips his eye up and batters him around with those uppercuts in a courageous effort given his physical condition.

                  Lewis was an enigma, no question. But you have to consider putting him top 10 all time heavies. He was a highly skilled huge man with power, all he lacked was a solid beard.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by cupcrazy01
                    GREAT.

                    Simple as that. Bowe avoided him, throw out any qualms about Lewis not fighting Bowe...Rid**** went as far as to embarrass himself and boxing by dumping that belt in the trash b/c he was so scared.

                    The prime debate is endless...he beat Holy twice but people say Evander was done; he beat a shot Tyson, sure, but he did beat a prime Tua, destroyed Ruddock (whom Tyson struggled against more than a little), a prime prospect (inexperience granted but ALOT of people picked the upset) in Grant, destoyed Golota, defeated solid fighters who would be HUGE challenges for today's heavies in Morrison, Briggs, and Akinwande. This is a solid resume, and it's not his fault that he was avoided like the plague in the early 90s.

                    Sure, he avoided Byrd, but he was all about taking on the young guns (Grant, Tua, Kirk Johnson--injury of course stopped that fight) who many deemed worthy of title shots. Then he steps in under trained against an incredibly motivated Vitali and rips his eye up and batters him around with those uppercuts in a courageous effort given his physical condition.

                    Lewis was an enigma, no question. But you have to consider putting him top 10 all time heavies. He was a highly skilled huge man with power, all he lacked was a solid beard.
                    i think we should putt lewis to top 10 of all time heavies. he use his size perfectly, and he also highly skilled. prime ll could beat anyone in boxing history. only think he dont have is a great chin but that maybe its for his own good. he know that and didnt got hit much and hard as many other greatest. great fihter he was

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Lewis was a great fighter. His two losses to McCall and Rahman seemed to come from his own ego, laziness and lack of taking his opponents seriously. But, when it came to the rematch, he destroyed them - especially Rahman. He was knocked out by McCall and Rahman, but I don't think they really dominated him through the fight. He let his guard down and got knocked out. Holyfield and VK gave him a much more difficult time. He was big, but still good on his feet. He had good technical skills. He didn't have the best chin, but it wasn't really bad either. And he had a lot of power. That one-two that knocked Rahman out was brutal.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP