Face it, Pacquiao is an all-time great!
Collapse
-
That's such a dirty way of presenting an argument. Here, for your education:So where do you have him ranked again? That's what I thought.
lets see, pacmans accomplishments:
-Moving up from low 100's to mid 140's. +
-Beating a recently ko'd hatton in rd 2. +
-Beating a weight Drained Old DLH. + ha
-Losing to Marquez Twice... in almost everyones, but his fans opinions. --
Explore the latest pound-for-pound boxing rankings and discover the top fighters in the world. Stay updated on the best pound-for-pound fighters across all weight divisions at BoxingScene.
And for the record, you have no ****ing list. Don't you get it? You're all "oh he's not even to 50" and act as though you recognize and can properly asses all the fighters that were mentioned in espn's all time list. When in reality, you can't even recognize half the ****ing names or have never seen them fight. They have teams of historians, pundits and statisticians that compile this sort of ****. You, on the other hand, can't, which is why you provided a link rather than list your own. And no don't bother asking me for mine I don't have one either. The difference is, I sure as hell don't try to act like I do.Comment
-
Comment
-
Do you know me?? Do you know what I study? Are do you assume?That's such a dirty way of presenting an argument. Here, for your education:
Explore the latest pound-for-pound boxing rankings and discover the top fighters in the world. Stay updated on the best pound-for-pound fighters across all weight divisions at BoxingScene.
And for the record, you have no ****ing list. Don't you get it? You're all "oh he's not even to 50" and act as though you recognize and can properly asses all the fighters that were mentioned in espn's all time list. When in reality, you can't even recognize half the ****ing names or have never seen them fight. They have teams of historians, pundits and statisticians that compile this sort of ****. You, on the other hand, can't, which is why you provided a link rather than list your own. And no don't bother asking me for mine I don't have one either. The difference is, I sure as hell don't try to act like I do.
The only thing you can say yes to is the latter....
END OF CONVO....
For you record, i never said he wasn't top 50..Comment
-
i have baldomir at #13084.That's such a dirty way of presenting an argument. Here, for your education:
Explore the latest pound-for-pound boxing rankings and discover the top fighters in the world. Stay updated on the best pound-for-pound fighters across all weight divisions at BoxingScene.
And for the record, you have no ****ing list. Don't you get it? You're all "oh he's not even to 50" and act as though you recognize and can properly asses all the fighters that were mentioned in espn's all time list. When in reality, you can't even recognize half the ****ing names or have never seen them fight. They have teams of historians, pundits and statisticians that compile this sort of ****. You, on the other hand, can't, which is why you provided a link rather than list your own. And no don't bother asking me for mine I don't have one either. The difference is, I sure as hell don't try to act like I do.
i'll post my top #13083 later.Comment
-
my apologies.
i don't know you.
i wouldn't know how ****** you are.
you sound ****** with your post though.
now can you give me your top 50 list. generally.Comment
-
lol, your boy has excellent recovery, i would be more impress if jmm gets up from a flush shot from Pac at 140.
edit: and NO, that's far from being the same flush shot that landed on Hatton. Pac has very little momentum on that punch that landed on jmmLast edited by boojee; 11-03-2009, 03:19 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment


Comment