Miguel Cotto Works Out in Las Vegas For Pacquiao

[Osirus022]

Heheehe if you dont know just let me inform that Cotto extended his fight with Jennings he did not wanted to finish the fight early...........

This was Evangelistas instructions as well... so dont get excited.

I'm not even gonna argue wit u on that one, because now that i remember, it looked as if Cotto WAS taking it easy and trying to stay longer as a good Sparring session, even when Jennings was running away he coulda put him away n just kept cool. Good reply.

[Sox8055]

Cotto!!!......

[wizzies]

i honestly predict an ass whooping on the 14th. replace cotto with sparring partner:



=

death.

ppl are taking this clip so seriously, I dont think they will play it on 24/7 for no reason. I think this is part of Roach psycho war.

Cotto will be in shock on Nov 14.

[prsi]

if cotto can't whoop the ass of a former 106 lber, he needs to retire.

I can copy paste too. See my post below.

shame on cotto if he can't whoop midget manny's ass.

You guys just make me laugh and are some times pathetic.
Base on your theory of "Shame" Marvin Hagler who was stronger and heavier and had a small reach advantage against Sugar Ray Leonard is a "Shame" for boxing not only because he couldn't ko Leonard but he lost to a man that came from a 3 year retirement where he had fought at 150 and went to 160 to fight Hagler for the 1st time.

Is Shane Mosley also a "Shame" for boxing because he couldn't ko a 2" smaller boxer while having more power and speed and a 7" reach advantage when he fought pricesly Miguel Cotto and not only that he lost to him also????

Most recently is PBF Floyd a "Shame" for boxing be cause he couldn't KO JMM who is 1" smaller has 5" reach disadvantage, weighed in 4lbs lighter than PBF (142 JMM vs 146 PBF) for the fight and was his 1st fight over 135 lbs in his career not to mention that PBF has more boxing skills, is faster, has more defense and is stonger than JMM????

Like these examples are plenty in boxing history. The fact is that Cotto will be heavier and stronger but Pacman will be faster, always has more stamina, movements and a much better corner which will give him a advantage in possible strategies, while they will be sharing the same reach and will have only a 1/2" height disadvantage. It will be up to which of these great warriors can take impose their advantages while neutralizing the advantage of their opponent. That is what boxing is all about!!!

With this said and the playing field leveled because of the advantages from both sides, why should it be a "SHAME" if Cotto loses or doesn't ko the current P4P king under these circumstances??

Like I said before you guys make this sound like this is a peice of cake fight for Cotto or it is David vs Goliath.
I'm rooting for Cotto but I give Pacman a great chance for victory bacause he does have the size, speed, stamina, movement to be in the ring with Cotto. Same chance of victory that Leonard had against Hagler and Cotto had against Mosley.

"SHAME" on you guys for not beleiving that

[bluetuazon]

i hope u guys will be here after the fight on the 14th...ill be here for sure!

[levz]

Yeah basing a clip for about 5 sec.?

Look for some Pacman's previous fights he was almost trap on the ring by barrage of punches then he can easily adjust in a split seconds.
(Morales and Hatton fights)

Well for me if Cotto can't whoop Pacmans midget ass in 4 rounds, it will be over its for Pacman's favor. The longer the fight the better chances of PACMAN (stamina) by points or even by K.O.

[Beater_of_ass]

i honestly predict an ass whooping on the 14th. replace cotto with sparring partner:



=

death.

Wow, I just saw something in that clip I didn't see before. The sparring partner, not sure who it is Castillo? Anyway, he slipped the left and nailed Paq with a double jab Manny is in some deep **** if Cotto does just that. Double jab left hook to the body will be open all night long. Especially that body shot, look at how high manny keeps his hands up, Roach better be working on some of this stuff.

[BMWM3P]

i honestly predict an ass whooping on the 14th. replace cotto with sparring partner:



=

death.

But Pac is unhitable, this video must be a fake. A ploy from Roach to make people think that Pac is actually human.

[SkilledB]

But Pac is unhitable, this video must be a fake. A ploy from Roach to make people think that Pac is actually human.

must be a fraud.....pac cant look like a beatable fighter.... just cant

[Brassangel]

i'm telling ya'll pac is too small

Your signature is the dumbest I've ever seen. Cotto ended the 10th round with several statement punches, despite everything Mosley had accomplished in the 9th and 10th in his mini-comeback. Then Cotto dominated Mosley in the 11th. That round wasn't even close. Round 12 was a snoozer, as niether fighter did anything except dance around one another until the bell rang. Proof that not only did Miguel not wane down the stretch, but also that you didn't watch the fight, you just listened to what the sound-bytes told you afterwards.

He was well ahead, and only needed to do enough to make a statement in the last round well humming on cruise-control. It was a close fight, but no one with a brain denies Cotto the victory. He neutralized Mosley's speed, walked through his power, and simply out-boxed him for 8 of the 12 rounds (at least).

I can copy paste too. See my post below.


You guys just make me laugh and are some times pathetic.
Base on your theory of "Shame" Marvin Hagler who was stronger and heavier and had a small reach advantage against Sugar Ray Leonard is a "Shame" for boxing not only because he couldn't ko Leonard but he lost to a man that came from a 3 year retirement where he had fought at 150 and went to 160 to fight Hagler for the 1st time.

Is Shane Mosley also a "Shame" for boxing because he couldn't ko a 2" smaller boxer while having more power and speed and a 7" reach advantage when he fought pricesly Miguel Cotto and not only that he lost to him also????

Most recently is PBF Floyd a "Shame" for boxing be cause he couldn't KO JMM who is 1" smaller has 5" reach disadvantage, weighed in 4lbs lighter than PBF (142 JMM vs 146 PBF) for the fight and was his 1st fight over 135 lbs in his career not to mention that PBF has more boxing skills, is faster, has more defense and is stonger than JMM????

Like these examples are plenty in boxing history. The fact is that Cotto will be heavier and stronger but Pacman will be faster, always has more stamina, movements and a much better corner which will give him a advantage in possible strategies, while they will be sharing the same reach and will have only a 1/2" height disadvantage. It will be up to which of these great warriors can take impose their advantages while neutralizing the advantage of their opponent. That is what boxing is all about!!!

With this said and the playing field leveled because of the advantages from both sides, why should it be a "SHAME" if Cotto loses or doesn't ko the current P4P king under these circumstances??

Like I said before you guys make this sound like this is a peice of cake fight for Cotto or it is David vs Goliath.
I'm rooting for Cotto but I give Pacman a great chance for victory bacause he does have the size, speed, stamina, movement to be in the ring with Cotto. Same chance of victory that Leonard had against Hagler and Cotto had against Mosley.

"SHAME" on you guys for not beleiving that

This post is made of win; win and candy.