why did joe calslapper only give mario veita rematch..

[Sir Tom Jones]

Did Calzaghe **** your mother?

just ****ed her and never called back.

[S A M U R A I]

calzaghe lost to robin reid, bika and hopkins yet conveniantly never gave them a rematch...yet mario veit who was a z level fighter he gave him a rematch and the only rematch of his career...

Plus a one handed kessler who nearly beat calslapper never got a rematch???


Please explain...thanks...

Simple. It was a mandatory.

Someone might have already said this, but I can't be bothered to read the whole thread.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[leemoorcroft]

calzaghe beat hopkins cause hopkins wouldnt fight it was the worse fight ive ever seen and i didnt want to pay my money to watch that again kessler one hand dont think if that was so he had an unbeaten record would never of got in there was his excuse to try and grab a rematch bika fight was good but clear a joe calzaghe win just a hater like you would see otheriwse joe won all that come before him much better than yeah hopkins lost what is it 5 haha and jones lost how many oh ye 5 overated the guy beat all fought the american best and won, jones took a major beat down cause he came to fight same would of happend to hopkins if he would of fought the guy guy was a legend

[slimshandy69]

calzaghe beat hopkins cause hopkins wouldnt fight it was the worse fight ive ever seen and i didnt want to pay my money to watch that again kessler one hand dont think if that was so he had an unbeaten record would never of got in there was his excuse to try and grab a rematch bika fight was good but clear a joe calzaghe win just a hater like you would see otheriwse joe won all that come before him much better than yeah hopkins lost what is it 5 haha and jones lost how many oh ye 5 overated the guy beat all fought the american best and won, jones took a major beat down cause he came to fight same would of happend to hopkins if he would of fought the guy guy was a legend

Do calslappe fans not know the definition of fullstops and grammar?

[SOPH~ REP.]

Calzaghe sucks

[S A M U R A I]

Do calslappe fans not know the definition of fullstops and grammar?

That might have worked, had you not fucked it up.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[True Guru]

Calzaghe didnt want to fight him again because it was pointless but it was a mando he was forced to fight or face having his title stripped from him,Veits promoters got the purse bid which was why it never happened in Britain.
Joe offered Reid a rematch,Reid turned it down.

[Bring It On]

Oh my... You do realize how badly Joe would have beaten Crotch up, don't you!?

Crotch is just an arrogant prick with poor skills who's gonna get his ass handed to him very soon. He's not even in the same league as Calzaghe were.

[iron mike tyson]

i cant get over how bad you must hate calzaghe if you think he lost to bika or that bika warranted a rematch , if i remember rightly dint joe near enough shut bika out????
also as for the other fights the reid fight was closely fought with alot of close rounds (just like the dirrel fight) but i had calzaghe 3 up at the end of it so no need for a rematch here. i could maybe understand the hopkins fight warranting a rematch but i dont think it was as close as the judges made it out to be but maybe thats me. its funny really hopkins negativity is enough for him to win the fight against calzaghe in your eyes but dirrels negativity was enough to take away from good work he was doing to froch to lose the fight for him

[daggum]

i cant get over how bad you must hate calzaghe if you think he lost to bika or that bika warranted a rematch , if i remember rightly dint joe near enough shut bika out????
also as for the other fights the reid fight was closely fought with alot of close rounds (just like the dirrel fight) but i had calzaghe 3 up at the end of it so no need for a rematch here. i could maybe understand the hopkins fight warranting a rematch but i dont think it was as close as the judges made it out to be but maybe thats me. its funny really hopkins negativity is enough for him to win the fight against calzaghe in your eyes but dirrels negativity was enough to take away from good work he was doing to froch to lose the fight for him

you are not remembering correctly.