Did anyone consider Floyd the best P4P before RJJ and Hopkins...

**daggum** · 10-29-2009, 08:22 PM

maybe a couple idiots but no one important. he just backed into the spot.

**street bully** · 10-29-2009, 08:23 PM

No. Jones and Hopkins were one and two for a long ass time, and both were regarded as the sports best.

**MaD RoBoT** · 10-29-2009, 09:00 PM

having 0 loss doesn't mean immortality

both Roy & Bhop fought the best of what their division(s) can bring

**BEEHOP** · 10-30-2009, 02:42 AM

Originally posted by MaD vEiN

having 0 loss doesn't mean immortality

both Roy & Bhop fought the best of what their division(s) can bring

I thought Bhop only fought blown up welters...

**Marijuana** · 10-30-2009, 02:50 AM

Originally posted by daggum

maybe a couple idiots but no one important. he just backed into the spot.

Same goes for Pac.

**Marijuana** · 10-30-2009, 02:50 AM

Originally posted by MaD vEiN

having 0 loss doesn't mean immortality

both Roy & Bhop fought the best of what their division(s) can bring

The best that the welterweight division can bring.

**The Gambler1981** · 10-30-2009, 03:04 AM

Back then Floyd was not that well known at all, some people did consider him to be the best back then but it was kind of like something to do to look in the know I don't know if people really believed that or not.

It is funny to think about how far Floyd has come because really that was not that long ago.

**The Gambler1981** · 10-30-2009, 03:14 AM

It would be similar to saying Paul Williams is the best P4P currently, although I think Floyd was more highly regarded to the hard core fans at that point then Willaims is currently but it is close enough. Chad Dawson would also work.

**bojangles1987** · 10-30-2009, 03:25 AM

Hell no. RJ was the man at the top that list for a long time, and most didn't even think about it.

Did anyone consider Floyd the best P4P before RJJ and Hopkins...