Paul Williams vs Joe Calzaghe
Collapse
-
-
Are we talking prime for prime? A slightly younger Joe (anywhere up to 2006/07) beats the piss out of Williams. No disrespect to Paul, cause I like him.
The current version of Joe, Williams wouldn't hurt him, so he loses. He's not winning a UD against Joe, he doesn't have the experience and ring smarts to beat him that way. It wouldn't be a one-sided beating, but there would be a clear winner. I doubt Paul would win more than 3 rounds.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Good Thread
I pick williams because of youth and hunger. Calzaghe good but wha has he really beat. Old Jones and Hopkins. Eventhough in the first Quintana fight PW got out boxed. Joe could possibly replicate that are we could see the williams who sits down on his punches and if he gets Joe tostop throwing as much. He will win.Last edited by EMACULATE; 10-23-2009, 07:09 PM.Comment
-
Hopkins of old is better than a young hopkinsGood Thread
I pick williams because of youth and hunger. Calzaghe good but wha has he really beat. Old Jones and Hopkins. Eventhough in the first Quintana fight PW got out boxed. Joe could possibly replicate that are we could see the williams who sits down on his punches and if he gets Joe tostop throwing as much. He will win.
Kessler the current 160 top dog
Lacy when he was unbeaten and was getting much respect. it was Joe that destroyed his career
byron mitchell(descent)
Chris Eubank in 97 who at the moment had onno lost to collins.
On top of that 10 years champion. Dont discredit Joe for sake's being.
On top of that u say if Pwill sits down on his punches, he has proven he doesn't know how to do that and is all talk. And how tha hell would he have been able to do so when joe would b going in circles to Pwills left...Comment
Comment