waddya know the same exact ref who let wardley wobble all over the ring for 5+ rounds while getting hurt over and over is the guy who stopped wardley-parker when parker was slightly buzzed yet still covering up and slipping punches. the narrative was "what if wardley lands more big punches? gotta think about parkers health" not even that wardley was stringing together those big punches but hey he could have in the future!
yet in wardley-dubois, dubios was literally landing big punches over and over on a defenseless wardley who was incredibly hurt. what happened to the hypotheticals? the real life scenario of someone taking big punches and being hurt happened and yet no stoppage until wardley was almost unable to stand and it was clear he was done. for example wardley was ten times more hurt in rounds 6 and 9 than parker ever was and yet...the fight continued. do people notice these things? or maybe they just dont care. this clown ref did what he knew he was supposed to do either implicitly or explicitly and he was rewarded for it with more big fights.
yet in wardley-dubois, dubios was literally landing big punches over and over on a defenseless wardley who was incredibly hurt. what happened to the hypotheticals? the real life scenario of someone taking big punches and being hurt happened and yet no stoppage until wardley was almost unable to stand and it was clear he was done. for example wardley was ten times more hurt in rounds 6 and 9 than parker ever was and yet...the fight continued. do people notice these things? or maybe they just dont care. this clown ref did what he knew he was supposed to do either implicitly or explicitly and he was rewarded for it with more big fights.
Comment