Is the weight difference for the Pacquiao/Cotto fight being exaggerated?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Freddy Krueger
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 5596
    • 159
    • 213
    • 6,618

    #1

    Is the weight difference for the Pacquiao/Cotto fight being exaggerated?

    Skills pay the bills, just ask heavyweights who fight 50-40-30 pounds difference between each other. Sultan Ibragimov kick the **** and seemed to stun Shannon Briggs at times in their fight and Sultan is only 220 while Briggs came in around 275.
    4
    Yes it is by some because skills pay the bills
    75.00%
    3
    No, its a fair statement. Because Cotto can win because of it
    25.00%
    1
    Just No
    0.00%
    0
  • Ch@mpBox@PR
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 21432
    • 432
    • 279
    • 22,261

    #2
    The difference in the fight will be that Cotto is the better skilled of the 2. Cotto will probably weight 155 fight night and Manny 150. Wich isnt that much!!!

    Comment

    • Freddy Krueger
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 5596
      • 159
      • 213
      • 6,618

      #3
      Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
      The difference in the fight will be that Cotto is the better skilled of the 2. Cotto will probably weight 155 fight night and Manny 150. Wich isnt that much!!!
      People seem to emphasize weight. Personally no matter who wins this fight no excuses from me, since I consider both to be two skillful warriors.

      Some ignorant Cotto fans if Cotto loses:
      Marg's plaster took the best out of Cotto.

      Some ignorant Pacquiao fans if Pacquiao loses:
      Cotto was just too big, because weight wins the fight not the skills


      I'm giving mad props to who ever wins, no excuses from me.
      Last edited by Freddy Krueger; 10-21-2009, 12:42 PM.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP