Due to Popular Demand... Official Froch vs Dirrell Scorecards!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • S A M U R A I
    Bulletproof
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 181694
    • 1,495
    • 1,324
    • 1,419,318

    #61
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    who pays for the judges?
    The promoter.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

    Comment

    • $partacus
      I'm SPARTACUS
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 4503
      • 247
      • 85
      • 11,373

      #62
      I had 2,6,7,8 for Froch and the rest to Dirrell. I think Dirrell won, but rounds 1,2,3,9 could have gone either way.

      Comment

      • MH300
        Up and Comer
        • Jun 2007
        • 34
        • 5
        • 0
        • 6,085

        #63
        Originally posted by Perro



        Source: Fight News
        How do the Mexican and Italian judges score exactly the same and then at the end the Italian completely changes pace and scoring style to Give Froch the last two rounds. Not to mention that they were probably two of the clearst for Dirrell specially the eleventh.

        Comment

        • fallenloki
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 1345
          • 77
          • 132
          • 1,681

          #64
          Regardless of the scores, Froch got handled.

          Comment

          • The_Demon
            Big dog
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 13603
            • 1,354
            • 888
            • 22,971

            #65
            looking at those ridiculous scorecards its obvious dirrell never had a chance of getting a decision no matter what he did,flaws the whole idea of the super 6 tourney.

            Comment

            • KILLA RIGHT
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2007
              • 8954
              • 294
              • 14
              • 16,348

              #66
              Originally posted by Carlos Frochos
              I had Froch by a point, but the way these guys came to their conclusions is baffling. Some of the clearer Dirrell rounds they have scored for Froch and vice versa. Makes me laugh when 3 guys come up with the most differing scorecards possible.
              i agree i had froch by a round..but the rounds they gave to some fighters are just weird

              Comment

              • The_Visitation
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 1570
                • 49
                • 24
                • 7,791

                #67
                Originally posted by Joe2608
                Those cards are so inconsitent.
                They're inconsistent because according to the combination of criteria the judges are actually supposed to be using every round was so bloody hard to score. It really is that simple.

                It can just happen in some fights. That's why I always like to see a good ol' fashioned KO, there's never any dispute then.

                Comment

                • ИATAS
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 36648
                  • 2,509
                  • 1,953
                  • 50,835

                  #68
                  Originally posted by MH300
                  How do the Mexican and Italian judges score exactly the same and then at the end the Italian completely changes pace and scoring style to Give Froch the last two rounds. Not to mention that they were probably two of the clearst for Dirrell specially the eleventh.
                  Thats a very good point man, obviously the Italian judge saw the same thing as the Mexican the entire fight up until the last two rounds...so how the hell could he give rounds 11 & 12 to Froch?!? Makes no sense. I mean maybe, just maybe he can make a case froch won 12, but NO WAY 11. Even the Belgium ****** scored 11 & 12 for dirrell.

                  Comment

                  • xxjace
                    BoxingScenes Ex
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 1671
                    • 89
                    • 81
                    • 8,257

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Perro
                    Haha, "useful"... WTF was that Italian judge watching? He either had too many drinks or was getting a handjob during the fight.
                    agreed...wtf??? is thAT?

                    Comment

                    • KJB
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 3362
                      • 56
                      • 1
                      • 9,656

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Šemise
                      Look at those bias British judges, oh wait...


                      A hometown decisions is a hometown decision.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP