No Rematch For Pacquiao-Cotto Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jozelle14
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 169
    • 14
    • 1
    • 312

    #1

    No Rematch For Pacquiao-Cotto Fight

    according to arum there wouldn't be a rematch. plus cotto extended his deal to top rank til 2011 and pacquiao extended his to 2012.
  • Benny Leonard
    Liberty
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 7436
    • 303
    • 38
    • 14,471

    #2
    If Cotto wins, no need for a rematch but if Cotto loses, I've always thought Champions with prestige deserve rematches. In this case, if it is a close fight, no matter who the winner is a rematch would be good.

    Comment

    • MANGLER
      Sex Tape Flop Artist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 30142
      • 1,705
      • 2,355
      • 46,598

      #3
      I wouldn't be surprised to see Cotto call for a rematch if he gets beat. Seems like it'd only be fair. Guess Arum thought otherwise.

      Comment

      • billionaire
        Banned
        • Jul 2008
        • 1930
        • 160
        • 90
        • 2,411

        #4
        Originally posted by mangler
        I wouldn't be surprised to see Cotto call for a rematch if he gets beat. Seems like it'd only be fair. Guess Arum thought otherwise.
        and why not? he gave a rematch to corley mosley and clottey after close fights....

        Comment

        • PittyPat
          Kin yer taste the blood?!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 11221
          • 715
          • 445
          • 28,773

          #5
          No need for a rematch, even if it's close. There's plenty of fights that need to be made immediately afterwards, so time mustn't be wasted.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP