Is Froch starting to piss you off ?

[Dynamite Kid]

Is Froch starting to piss you off ? i used to dislike Froch originally, mainly because he had a big mouth and would not fight anyone worth a damn, yet he still thought he was entitled to a fight with Calzaghe, however i started to warm to him after his win over Pascal & then after the Taylor fight i thought a bit more highly of him, even though he got schooled for most of the fight.

Too much is too much though, when he used to tease Calzaghe it was pretty funny because all Calz fan boys used to get all bent out of shape about it, now i always thought Froch was ****ing with Calz and that he did not really believe half the **** he was chatting but now im not so sure, he thinks he is Leonard/Hearns in terms of Boxing skills, yet he gets schooled by an inexperienced fighter and gets a decision he blatently did not deserve, then there was his post fight interview, now this BS about Calzaghe again!!

Too much is too much, Froch needs to realize it was funny when it was funny but now its old and tired and that he is a tough cavemen who needs a reality check, nothing more.

[The_Demon]

he is irritating,horrible too watch,unskilled
at first it was bearable but now he has just got ridiculous with everything he says
he is either ******ed or a liar because the things he comes out with are unbelievable
that said,i am genuinely concerned about his health in his next two fights

[Roger Mellie]

Na, He has had one dud fight. He aint the judges or the referee. Say what you like about him,but he won the title in an absolute war,and managed to pull out a last round KO when he needed it in his opponents hometown in his first defense. I had Dirrell winning,but it was a horrible fight that was close. He has a dodgy skillset, but as of yet no one has been able to capitalise fully on that.

[slimshandy69]

Na, He has had one dud fight. He aint the judges or the referee. Say what you like about him,but he won the title in an absolute war,and managed to pull out a last round KO when he needed it in his opponents hometown in his first defense. I had Dirrell winning,but it was a horrible fight that was close. He has a dodgy skillset, but as of yet no one has been able to capitalise fully on that.

you still not given any decent reasons as to why dirrell won...

Buncey had froch winning..the press at ringside had froch winning, even yank had froch winning...

The judges had froch winning...

Dirrell face was bruised and bloody yet froch diodnt have a scratch...

Look at my sig ffs evidence alone that froch won...

[The_Demon]

you still not given any decent reasons as to why dirrell won...

Buncey had froch winning..the press at ringside had froch winning, even yank had froch winning...

The judges had froch winning...

Dirrell face was bruised and bloody yet froch diodnt have a scratch...

Look at my sig ffs evidence alone that froch won...

froch isnt that good
get over it kid

[D-MiZe]

All these ****** ****s making Dirrell-Froch threads are pissing me off.

[Dynamite Kid]

you still not given any decent reasons as to why dirrell won...

Buncey had froch winning..the press at ringside had froch winning, even yank had froch winning...

The judges had froch winning...

Dirrell face was bruised and bloody yet froch diodnt have a scratch...

Look at my sig ffs evidence alone that froch won...

Well if that objective guy Steve Bunce had had winning then i apologize, he is clearly! not partial to being biased against American's and pro Brits, is he

[FreshOutOfHell]

you still not given any decent reasons as to why dirrell won...

Buncey had froch winning..the press at ringside had froch winning, even yank had froch winning...

The judges had froch winning...

Dirrell face was bruised and bloody yet froch diodnt have a scratch...

Look at my sig ffs evidence alone that froch won...

Froch wants us to compare him against the ATG's, and he coudn't do better than a SD against a green fighter.
Legit win or not, Froch doesn't live up to his own mouth.
My god was Dirrell going to get a beating.

[Stickman]

Whether you agree with the decision over Dirrell or not, alot of what Froch said in the interview was correct....Dirrell fought scared, spent much of his time running or avoiding any engagement, excessively holding, and toppling to the canvas when things got a little rough inside.

That does NOT look good in judges eyes, anywhere, and is probably ample reason to have lost even though he was clearly the better boxer. I admit having Andre ahead on my scorecards (not by much), but knew that the judges ringside would probably not share my views. In my opinion this wasn't anything close to a robbery, and even had it been scored by American judges here in the US, there's a good chance it would've gone the way it did.

Dirrell could have, at any time, pressed the action, used his talent and ability, and probably ended the fight early with a KO win. Instead, he chose to fight the way he did, and acheived exactly what he deserved.

Froch may not have the talent that Dirrell has, or the speed, or anything else, but he did come to the ring to fight. Andre did not, and that's why it went the way it did.

[Dynamite Kid]

Whether you agree with the decision over Dirrell or not, alot of what Froch said in the interview was correct....Dirrell fought scared, spent much of his time running or avoiding any engagement, excessively holding, and toppling to the canvas when things got a little rough inside.

That does NOT look good in judges eyes, anywhere, and is probably ample reason to have lost even though he was clearly the better boxer. I admit having Andre ahead on my scorecards (not by much), but knew that the judges ringside would probably not share my views. In my opinion this wasn't anything close to a robbery, and even had it been scored by American judges here in the US, there's a good chance it would've gone the way it did.

Dirrell could have, at any time, pressed the action, used his talent and ability, and probably ended the fight early with a KO win. Instead, he chose to fight the way he did, and acheived exactly what he deserved.

Froch may not have the talent that Dirrell has, or the speed, or anything else, but he did come to the ring to fight. Andre did not, and that's why it went the way it did.

Dirrell could of sprinted around the ring for all i care, this game is about hitting the opponent and he did that more times and more cleanly. I agree that the decision definitely would of gone to Froch had it been in America but that dont make either of the judges right, Dirrell won that fight, the fans are the real judges.