Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao May Stop Cotto in One Round, Says Roach

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by fdotorres View Post
    don't change the subject. you said judah nearly stopped cotto in round one, and you know that's pure bull****. find me in that video where was cotto close to being stopped
    how many more of those shots was Cotto going to be able to take? if there's no low blow he was in serious trouble. Cotto is slow, his body movement is slow and his hands are slow.

    EDIT: judah's a master at throwing uppercuts. show me one of pac's uppercuts that come close to the one judah landed on that round
    It's not about uppercuts, it's about handspeed and body movement. Pac is much sharper than Judah and Judah was already too sharp for Cotto.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
      Judah nearly stopped Cotto in R.1, so why not Pacquiao, he's even quicker than Zab.
      ^^^^

      Comment


      • #43
        roach"the best camp he's ever had"...!!!
        ha ha...somethings up.
        i'm getting the feeling theres tension there
        and everything roach says he means the opposite.
        things are looking up underdog cotto!

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Story View Post
          ^^^^
          you don't think Cotto was hurt?

          Comment


          • #45
            [IMG]http://www.thepeoplescube.com/images/*****_Poster_Hitler_Yesweca.gif[/IMG]

            Pac can defeat Cotto but not that fast. He will give up but not that quick. He will fight til the end. It will be a similar fight with David Diaz.

            Comment


            • #46
              this dude is trying to intimdate Cotto or he smoking some serious crack.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
                how many more of those shots was Cotto going to be able to take? if there's no low blow he was in serious trouble. Cotto is slow, his body movement is slow and his hands are slow.

                It's not about uppercuts, it's about handspeed and body movement. Pac is much sharper than Judah and Judah was already too sharp for Cotto.
                he was so sharp that he got KO'd. sure, make the low blow excuse. maybe we can say that morales beat pac because he used winning gloves and because of the cut being ruled as made by a punch and not a headbutt. excuses are beautiful, but that's all they are: excuses

                what happened in the mosley fight? did you forgot? let me remind you: cotto beat him by handling his speed with timing

                i'm not saying that cotto will surely beat pac (since it's a 50/50 fight), but your comments are not only absurd, but laughable as well

                lets do something boxing guru. i'll go all in with you. if cotto lasts more than hatton, i win. if cotto lands more than hatton, i win. you know, since hatton is faster and more active than cotto, you'll surely win. it's easy money for you

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by fdotorres View Post
                  he was so sharp that he got KO'd. sure, make the low blow excuse. maybe we can say that morales beat pac because he used winning gloves and because of the cut being ruled as made by a punch and not a headbutt. excuses are beautiful, but that's all they are: excuses

                  what happened in the mosley fight? did you forgot? let me remind you: cotto beat him by handling his speed with timing

                  i'm not saying that cotto will surely beat pac (since it's a 50/50 fight), but your comments are not only absurd, but laughable as well
                  The evidence is there, if you don't want to see it it's up to you. You can't compare Mosley with Pacquiao, that's crazy, Pac is much much more elusive by virtue of his size and continuous body movement and much quicker. Judah is the nearest comparison to Pac and even he is nowhere near as fast and elusive as Pac.

                  lets do something boxing guru. i'll go all in with you. if cotto lasts more than hatton, i win. if cotto lands more than hatton, i win. you know, since hatton is faster and more active than cotto, you'll surely win. it's easy money for you
                  'lasting' doesn't mean anything to me, Dirrell lasted against Froch because he ran for 12 rounds, that's a coward's way. ODLH probably landed more than Hatton but he didn't make a fight of it, he stood there in front of Pac and got pot-shotted and quit on his stool.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
                    you don't think Cotto was hurt?
                    he wasn't hurt, he was rocked, wobbled, staggered by a punch he didn't saw. he never stop throwing punches back, and was never close to going down.

                    i'm starting to realize that you really don't know the difference between being hurt and being rocked

                    watch cotto vs corley or cotto vs torres if you wanna see cotto really hurt early in a fight

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      No, just no.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP