This maybe the tip of the iceberg re: su****ions of performance enhancers use by PAC

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cle-Venger
    Banned
    • Sep 2009
    • 126
    • 22
    • 35
    • 179

    #11
    Of course he's on something. He's from a small 2nd world country, and doesn't know much about these types of things. They become big and pick up some jerk off big time trainer.. This trainer really wants to make a name for himself, and the un suspecting boxer does whatever he says, especially since its working..

    There is no doubtin my mind pac is on something. I hate that it's like that, but it is, and it's truly not even his fault.

    Comment

    • loui_ludwig
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2005
      • 7669
      • 184
      • 2
      • 19,376

      #12
      Stop being a Pac hater. NSAC came out with a statement also about Pac being clean during testing after Floyd Daddy's accusation.

      Comment

      • BOX-A-LOT
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 779
        • 31
        • 0
        • 987

        #13
        Originally posted by blacksocks
        Until he is tested positive, these are all rumors and speculations. Don't they test these boxers before and after a fight particularly in the USA?
        Yes, but, you have to question how sophisticated are these state athletic commissions testing programs. One thing I know for a fact is that NSAC does not test for HGH. Just 'roids.

        For example, I had a GF who used to work for a company that sold "drug test programs to companies" what I didn't know prior, was that there were different types of drug tests, the most common one is the urine test, also the easiest one to get around it, if one were using drugs.
        Last edited by BOX-A-LOT; 10-20-2009, 12:12 AM.

        Comment

        • BOX-A-LOT
          Banned
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 779
          • 31
          • 0
          • 987

          #14
          Originally posted by loui_ludwig
          Stop being a Pac hater. NSAC came out with a statement also about Pac being clean during testing after Floyd Daddy's accusation.
          I'm not being a hater. Like the old saying goes " You're most often judged by the company you keep"

          Comment

          • Kalion
            Boxing Scene's Spartacus
            • Jul 2006
            • 1493
            • 73
            • 16
            • 7,983

            #15
            Originally posted by loui_ludwig
            Stop being a Pac hater. NSAC came out with a statement also about Pac being clean during testing after Floyd Daddy's accusation.
            Marion Jones tested positive during the olympics then 5 years later they restest her samples with new test and they show positive.

            In order to catch someone on PEDs you have to know what you are testing for, If i come up with a PED today and for 2 years you take it and the NSAC dosent know about the PED how can they test you for it? Until they develope a test to indicate the PED i have designed you will always seem to piss clean.


            Thats the problem with sports and PEDs today...

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #16
              I thought this was common knowledge.

              Comment

              • BOX-A-LOT
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 779
                • 31
                • 0
                • 987

                #17
                Originally posted by loui_ludwig
                Stop being a Pac hater. NSAC came out with a statement also about Pac being clean during testing after Floyd Daddy's accusation.
                You have to remember something, NSAC only tests for steroids, there are other types of performance enhancers ya know.

                And, there are different types of tests, not all testing programs are the same, or not as stringent as others.

                And I'd also like to add that $$$$ talks at the end of the day. There are only two cash cows in boxing, Floyd and PAC. Do you have any clue how much revenue a PAC fight brings to Vegas???
                Last edited by BOX-A-LOT; 10-20-2009, 12:11 AM.

                Comment

                • BoxingChaos
                  Ambiguous
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 4596
                  • 311
                  • 272
                  • 11,182

                  #18


                  Comment

                  • blacksocks
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 319
                    • 14
                    • 0
                    • 6,822

                    #19
                    Originally posted by BOX-A-LOT
                    Yes, but, you have to consider how sophisticated are these state athletic commissions testing programs. One thing I know for a fact is that NSAC does not test for HGH. Just 'roids.

                    For example, I had a GF who used to work for a company that sold "drug test programs to companies" what I didn't know prior, was that there were different types of drug tests, the most common one is the urine test, also the easiest one to get around it, if one were using drugs.
                    Then somebody should ask for a more stringent testing for both Pac and Cotto to erase all doubts. Floyd Sr. instead of blabbering and destroying Pac's reputation should write a formal letter to the NSAC for stricter tests. Cotto's camp can do the same.

                    Comment

                    • baracuda
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 10779
                      • 259
                      • 569
                      • 11,470

                      #20
                      sure...........

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP