This maybe the tip of the iceberg re: su****ions of performance enhancers use by PAC

[Al Haymon]

Can you just shut the f**k up! You're a different breed of qu**r. It's so funny how you say you like PAC, yet, every PAC thread you find a way to discredit him.

I mean, the fact that you are under the impression that PAC is on 'roids, that alone is basically discrediting him.

Isn't it funny that you don't give credit to PAC for beating De La Joto. I mean, PAC was a huge underdog going into this fight and everyone had already taken into consideration or had the common sense that a) De La Joto was already old b)had been fighting sporadically c) hasn't fought at 147 for a number of years, yet, many still picked him to win by a mile!!

But yet, you give Floyd all the extra licks to his b*lls like for everything the mofo does. I don't remember a time when Floyd came in as an underdog, so how can the guy be given credit for something that was suppose to happen. For all the fights that PAC came in as a huge favorite, I can't give him credit either. You can't seriously say that Floyd gets more credit for beating Juanita, when he was the overwhelming favorite, compared to when PAC beat the living **** out of De La Joto.

You want me to shut up... yet you provide lengthy responses to all of my posts.

Odd.

Oscar Delahoya was jerky when Manny beat him. No credit for that.

[BOX-A-LOT]

You want me to shut up... yet you provide lengthy responses to all of my posts.

Odd.

Oscar Delahoya was jerky when Manny beat him. No credit for that.

Just as odd as how you say you like PAC, yet, a) you think he's on 'roids b) you don't really give him any credit for fights where he came in as the underdog c) you have a multitude of reasons as to why PAC's really not all that, yet, "you like him as a fighter". d) you think his religiousness is a front, yet you applaud Floyd for being " a great marketer of b.s.

You talk like a qu**r, that's the most annoying thing about you. Shut your f**kin' mouth.

[redpablo]

Michael Jordan and Lebron James was/is on steroids as well.

I mean, any athlete who has done something amazing and very hard to duplicate is on steroids.

[BOX-A-LOT]

You want me to shut up... yet you provide lengthy responses to all of my posts.

Odd.

Oscar Delahoya was jerky when Manny beat him. No credit for that.

Oscar was jerky when he lost a close decision to your Papi, Oscar was jerky when he lost to B-Hop, Oscar was jerky when he annihilated Vargas and Mayorga. Oscar was jerky when he beat Forbes.

So, who gets more credit, a fighter who was the overwhelming favorite to beat his opponent, or the huge underdog that beat the odds?

[andrew14]

just let the authority do their job, they know better than TS.

if your making a thread out of humor or something based on nothing just keep it

to yourself..

[Al Haymon]

Just as odd as how you say you like PAC, yet, a) you think he's on 'roids b) you don't really give him any credit for fights where he came in as the underdog c) you have a multitude of reasons as to why PAC's really not all that, yet, "you like him as a fighter". d) you think his religiousness is a front, yet you applaud Floyd for being " a great marketer of b.s.

You talk like a qu**r, that's the most annoying thing about you. Shut your f**kin' mouth.

Um, no.

And just as a piece of advice, when you give a command, you should be able to enforce that. Otherwise, you just look silly.

Back to Pacquiao's steroid abuse....

WHat do you guys think... it's hGH? Or anabolics?

[Al Haymon]

Oscar was jerky when he lost a close decision to your Papi, Oscar was jerky when he lost to B-Hop, Oscar was jerky when he annihilated Vargas and Mayorga. Oscar was jerky when he beat Forbes.

So, who gets more credit, a fighter who was the overwhelming favorite to beat his opponent, or the huge underdog that beat the odds?

By "jerky" , I mean dried out. As in beef jerky.

Oscar was dehydrated. Roach said so himself. You disagree with Roach?

[sandyvahra]

Oscar was jerky when he lost a close decision to your Papi, Oscar was jerky when he lost to B-Hop, Oscar was jerky when he annihilated Vargas and Mayorga. Oscar was jerky when he beat Forbes.

So, who gets more credit, a fighter who was the overwhelming favorite to beat his opponent, or the huge underdog that beat the odds?

Let it be, any sports fan will tell you the underdog winning means more. The fight was seen as a mismatch & pac came through. That's why he's the fighter of the decade. He not only repeatedly challenges himself but he succeeds.

[BOX-A-LOT]

Um, no.

And just as a piece of advice, when you give a command, you should be able to enforce that. Otherwise, you just look silly.

Back to Pacquiao's steroid abuse....

WHat do you guys think... it's hGH? Or anabolics?

I guess I could take the Al Mamon route of putting you on "ignore", but I ain't a qu**r like you, lol.

Only people I know that give the silent treatment when they're mad, are people that have vag*nas.

By "jerky" , I mean dried out. As in beef jerky.

Oscar was dehydrated. Roach said so himself. You disagree with Roach?

No, are you, haha(click below qu**r)



As if coming in "dehydrated" was the only factor for De La Joto losing(it was just icing on the cake), there were several factors that contributed to Joto's lost, some his own and some because PAC simply had what it took to get the job done !

[Akinapepemo]

Correct me if this hasn't been pointed out before:

i think the reason why there has been no 'source' is well explained by this thread in the aussie lounge:

........boxingscene.com /forums/showthread.php?t=316205

(titled manny likes bananas)

Philfy ( threadstarter over there) already said he made it up.


to Box-a-lot, i don't know if you were kidding, but i hope you were, otherwise it would be very embarassing on your part to take a joke so seriously. peace.