Froch won... End of story

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kball15
    HATTON WRIGHT PAVLIK
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 15471
    • 491
    • 86
    • 22,680

    #1

    Froch won... End of story

    Enough already. It was a close fight, but Froch got the nod.

    Anyone who thinks Dirrell CLEARLY won the fight knows jack **** about scoring fights.

    Im sick of discussing boxing with some on you, cause some of you clearly kno nothing about boxing. ESPECIALLY on how to score a fight.

    THe only reason there even WAS a fight on saturday, is because Froch decided he was going to make one.

    If he stood still all night, Dirrell would not have landed a punch.

    Froch often out freakin jabbed Dirrell. His punches werent clean, and they were nasty, but they were much more powerful. Dirrell came on late and won the late rounds, but it wasnt enough.

    If you thought DIrrell won the fight, fine. But he did not CLEARLY win the fight. thats absurd. IT was a dirty, sloppy, horrible fight, that niether fighter clearly won.

    Froch got the nod, so ****in deal with it
  • George W Bush
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 316
    • 19
    • 0
    • 411

    #2
    Originally posted by Kball15
    Froch won... End of story
    And Juan Diaz won too... End of story

    Comment

    • mathed
      molṑn labé
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 54551
      • 2,743
      • 2,984
      • 224,675

      #3
      Originally posted by Kball15
      Enough already. It was a close fight, but Froch got the nod.

      Anyone who thinks Dirrell CLEARLY won the fight knows jack **** about scoring fights.

      Im sick of discussing boxing with some on you, cause some of you clearly kno nothing about boxing. ESPECIALLY on how to score a fight.

      THe only reason there even WAS a fight on saturday, is because Froch decided he was going to make one.

      If he stood still all night, Dirrell would not have landed a punch.

      Froch often out freakin jabbed Dirrell. His punches werent clean, and they were nasty, but they were much more powerful. Dirrell came on late and won the late rounds, but it wasnt enough.

      If you thought DIrrell won the fight, fine. But he did not CLEARLY win the fight. thats absurd. IT was a dirty, sloppy, horrible fight, that niether fighter clearly won.

      Froch got the nod, so ****in deal with it
      I hope he enjoyed the win, it will be his last of the tourney tho!

      Comment

      • goldenglove2
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 2763
        • 54
        • 8
        • 8,954

        #4
        Originally posted by Kball15
        Enough already. It was a close fight, but Froch got the nod.

        Anyone who thinks Dirrell CLEARLY won the fight knows jack **** about scoring fights.

        Im sick of discussing boxing with some on you, cause some of you clearly kno nothing about boxing. ESPECIALLY on how to score a fight.

        THe only reason there even WAS a fight on saturday, is because Froch decided he was going to make one.

        If he stood still all night, Dirrell would not have landed a punch.

        Froch often out freakin jabbed Dirrell. His punches werent clean, and they were nasty, but they were much more powerful. Dirrell came on late and won the late rounds, but it wasnt enough.

        If you thought DIrrell won the fight, fine. But he did not CLEARLY win the fight. thats absurd. IT was a dirty, sloppy, horrible fight, that niether fighter clearly won.

        Froch got the nod, so ****in deal with it
        ok, How bout he CLEARLY landed the CLEANER punches...and CLEARY won more rounds..( and the championship round too)

        also means he clearly won the fight

        Comment

        • -Hyperion-
          The Best And Fastest Ride
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 14176
          • 912
          • 1,378
          • 35,380

          #5
          and kelly pavlik is a legend and hits harder than hearns and has more toughness than hagler....

          Comment

          • SOPH~ REP.
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2009
            • 1718
            • 34
            • 6
            • 9,827

            #6
            Originally posted by -Hyperion-
            and kelly pavlik is a legend and hits harder than hearns and has more toughness than hagler....
            Y
            One question.....Are You High ?

            Comment

            • joelab75
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 1535
              • 24
              • 0
              • 7,683

              #7
              Originally posted by Kball15
              Enough already. It was a close fight, but Froch got the nod.

              Anyone who thinks Dirrell CLEARLY won the fight knows jack **** about scoring fights.

              Im sick of discussing boxing with some on you, cause some of you clearly kno nothing about boxing. ESPECIALLY on how to score a fight.

              THe only reason there even WAS a fight on saturday, is because Froch decided he was going to make one.

              If he stood still all night, Dirrell would not have landed a punch.

              Froch often out freakin jabbed Dirrell. His punches werent clean, and they were nasty, but they were much more powerful. Dirrell came on late and won the late rounds, but it wasnt enough.

              If you thought DIrrell won the fight, fine. But he did not CLEARLY win the fight. thats absurd. IT was a dirty, sloppy, horrible fight, that niether fighter clearly won.

              Froch got the nod, so ****in deal with it
              keep on dreaming! Dirrell won the fight. you know it. watch it again.

              Comment

              • Kevin Jesus
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 7723
                • 280
                • 514
                • 8,467

                #8
                Originally posted by Kball15
                Enough already. It was a close fight, but Froch got the nod.

                Anyone who thinks Dirrell CLEARLY won the fight knows jack **** about scoring fights.

                Im sick of discussing boxing with some on you, cause some of you clearly kno nothing about boxing. ESPECIALLY on how to score a fight.

                THe only reason there even WAS a fight on saturday, is because Froch decided he was going to make one.

                If he stood still all night, Dirrell would not have landed a punch.

                Froch often out freakin jabbed Dirrell. His punches werent clean, and they were nasty, but they were much more powerful. Dirrell came on late and won the late rounds, but it wasnt enough.

                If you thought DIrrell won the fight, fine. But he did not CLEARLY win the fight. thats absurd. IT was a dirty, sloppy, horrible fight, that niether fighter clearly won.

                Froch got the nod, so ****in deal with it
                Dirrell clearly won the fight.

                Comment

                • Lokotron
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 786
                  • 47
                  • 80
                  • 7,317

                  #9
                  Dirrellington clearly won that fight now go cry in your closet.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP