Crawford has said he doesn’t have Pacquiao in his list of greatest boxers. Says he’s overrated and insinuates he cheated. People say he’s hating but does he have a point?
Main problems with Pacquiao’s career:
1. Multiple catchweight fights
2. Biggest name win (Oscar) was severely weight-drained
3. Arguably lost to Marquez all 4 times and got 3 gifts
4. Refused blood-testing demands during years of his prime
5. Never undisputed
6. Lost to a school teacher
As for the 8-division thing:
1. There was no title on the line vs Barrera. Barrera wasn’t lineal. Pac was awarded the Ring belt afterwards.
2. Also no belt on the line vs Hatton at 140, it was for the Ring title. The Ring is just a magazine. And many say Hatton also wasn’t lineal because he moved up to 147 and lost.
3. Fought Margarito for the 154 belt at 150 catchweight
Again the Ring is a magazine they don’t own lineal and they are not an official sanctioning body.
So more like 5 divisions.
Is Crawford right about Pacquiao being overrated?
Main problems with Pacquiao’s career:
1. Multiple catchweight fights
2. Biggest name win (Oscar) was severely weight-drained
3. Arguably lost to Marquez all 4 times and got 3 gifts
4. Refused blood-testing demands during years of his prime
5. Never undisputed
6. Lost to a school teacher
As for the 8-division thing:
1. There was no title on the line vs Barrera. Barrera wasn’t lineal. Pac was awarded the Ring belt afterwards.
2. Also no belt on the line vs Hatton at 140, it was for the Ring title. The Ring is just a magazine. And many say Hatton also wasn’t lineal because he moved up to 147 and lost.
3. Fought Margarito for the 154 belt at 150 catchweight
Again the Ring is a magazine they don’t own lineal and they are not an official sanctioning body.
So more like 5 divisions.
Is Crawford right about Pacquiao being overrated?
Comment