Post evidence of the Froch "Rabbit Punches". Come all sore Americans.

**S A M U R A I** · 10-19-2009, 02:18 PM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

Please, someone post evidence whereby we can clearly see these so called "infractions" taking place.

Well, it's a tricky one, this... but you could always try watching the video. That's assuming you have at least one working eye.

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

**Shattered Jaw** · 10-19-2009, 02:31 PM

I don't see rabbit punches. I would like someone to point them out with youtube evidence.

Most likely it's just Froch haters trying to discredit another Froch win.

**slimshandy69** · 10-19-2009, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

I am hearing too much about "Rabbit Punches".

Please, someone post evidence whereby we can clearly see these so called "infractions" taking place.

NOTE: A rabbit punch is not when Dirrell is bending right down to the waist and exposing the back of his head to Froch. If a fighter does that - he is there to be hit. Ask Larry.

Also, if Dirrell is coming at Froch and hugging him (as he so often did, disgracefully) and Froch hits him to the *side* of the head. That is not a rabbit punch. If Froch is trying to get his shots off and all Dirrell wants to do is hold on and take Froch's shots - that's his own fault.

Now, let's see these "rabbit punches"....

good post mate i agree dirrell bent over backwarsds to get twated in the head..as 90 percent of the fight he was even trying to suck froch off or showing the back of his head by ducking below his waist...easy victory for froch...

**TheGreatA** · 10-19-2009, 02:33 PM

7:10

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 10-19-2009, 02:38 PM

Froch did rabbit punch but it was predominantly after Dirrell ducked below the waist or put his head on Froch's chest whilst hugging him lovingly.

**markfrombrookly** · 10-19-2009, 02:41 PM

Doesn't matter if Dirrell was clinching and his head was to the side.. Froch seen it and purposely punched him in the back of the head, he even said so in the post fight interview.. That's ILLEGAL. It's one thing if you accidently hit the guy in the head but Froch said he "giving me the back of his head". So he rabbit punched him on purpose.

**S A M U R A I** · 10-19-2009, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

Most likely it's just Froch haters trying to discredit another Froch win.

It's not. I for one have been supporting Froch from his pro debut in 2002 right up until this fight with Dirrell. I won't support him again.

I've never been a hater. I said He'd KO Taylor 9 months before it happened, I was called crazy for it, but I was saying don't underestimate the guy's toughness and drive. I also picked him to win against Dirrell (check my bets record) because I knew a hometown decision could be a major factor in the outcome of this fight.

I'm not a Dirrell fan, so there's no bias there. I think Dirrell is currently more flash than substance, but he is young, 19 fights, and already a good fighter. He will improve and learn from this fight. If this guy can develop some power he would be dangerous as hell.

Again, I'm not Froch hater, it's plain and simple:

As a boxing fan who walks the line of complete neutrality as far as these two fighters are concerned, Froch was ****. He really was terrible on Saturday night and Dirrell should have won. I don't believe he put on the type of performance expected of a world champion, but Froch was that useless. I only realized how bad he looked on a second viewing of the fight and in better quality than the live broadcast. The picture was broken up and it was hard to see just how often Froch was landed on at the time. Similarly, it was hard to see just how inaccurate Froch was.

Froch lost. Plain as daylight. Now he will probably be ridiculed as being **** for the rest of his career, so we're gonna see some very bitchy Froch fans from here on in.

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 10-19-2009, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by markfrombrookly

Doesn't matter if Dirrell was clinching and his head was to the side.. Froch seen it and purposely punched him in the back of the head, he even said so in the post fight interview.. That's ILLEGAL. It's one thing if you accidently hit the guy in the head but Froch said he "giving me the back of his head". So he rabbit punched him on purpose.

He said he hit him when he was ducking below the waist. And it kinda does matter if hes clinching when Froch is trying to work on the inside. You'll notice Froch also hit him with uppercuts and shots to the side of the head whilst Dirrel was clinging onto him for dear life.

**ИATAS** · 10-19-2009, 02:45 PM

uh, it wasn't only when dirrell ducked low or turned his head, nearly every time dirrell clinched him froch was punching him in the back and side of the head. Post a video? It happened every round, just watch the fight.

Post evidence of the Froch "Rabbit Punches". Come all sore Americans.