the excuses for dirrell losing fairly and squarely to froch are halarious

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eaner0919
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 8625
    • 370
    • 80
    • 15,578

    #21
    Originally posted by slimshandy69
    i was live at the fight...being live automatically has me a better judge than all you yanks and calslappe bum boys....

    Heres how i saw it...i gave froch at least two out of the first three, dirrell literally threw one punch...

    round 4 i gave dirrell...rounds 5 and 6 even..round 7,8,9 and 10 to froch with dirrell taking round 11 and evens round 12...
    wow thats horrible

    you gave Dirrell three rounds total, 3 rounds even, and 6 to Froch? sadly I would ask if you were joking but I know you're not

    and no actually being live at the fight doesn't make your score any better or worse than those who saw it on TV I personally have been to many a fight and can say scoring isn't any better

    Comment

    • S A M U R A I
      Bulletproof
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 181694
      • 1,495
      • 1,324
      • 1,419,318

      #22
      Originally posted by Butterball
      Someone ban this idiot please, he's embarrassing me.
      This...........



      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

      Comment

      • S A M U R A I
        Bulletproof
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 181694
        • 1,495
        • 1,324
        • 1,419,318

        #23
        Originally posted by slimshandy69
        why does my sig show otherwise
        The first pic is just a jab, you ****ing idiot.

        So, big deal. You have pics of the few shots of Froch actually landing a punch. Now please go get the pics of Dirrell connecting on Froch.



        100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

        Comment

        • LEFTYGUNZZ
          GUNZ 4 HIRE
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 4264
          • 218
          • 184
          • 10,891

          #24
          Originally posted by slimshandy69
          i was live at the fight...being live automatically has me a better judge than all you yanks and calslappe bum boys....

          Heres how i saw it...i gave froch at least two out of the first three, dirrell literally threw one punch...

          round 4 i gave dirrell...rounds 5 and 6 even..round 7,8,9 and 10 to froch with dirrell taking round 11 and evens round 12...
          I dont know the exact rounds but I socred it for Dirrell not by much. There wwere some rounds in there where both fighters didnt do much Froch did a lot fo under handed veteran moves including punching the back of the head the hip toss forearms to the face shoulders into the chin etc.... Dirrell tried to counter act at the wrong time and leaned his head into Froch but the reff saw and called it was very blatant. Dirrell had the more clean shots but he also ended up getting pushed back and forced to move to avoid exchanges. Most judges socre for the one making the fight and pushing the action. Perception is key and the way the fight was recieved was a younger challenger was complaing the whole fight then tried to do some dirty stuff and got caught after he was the one complaining. He was going down to ne knee often holding excessivley in the guy HOMETOWN. He was in a ring where 15K fans would not have minded seeing him get gullotined much less hit on the back of the head and he was COMPLAINING? ****** is as ****** does. he should have quited the crowd and Froch by throwing more 5-6 combos which he was landing them when he fired but not enough. he should have pressed the KO when his own corner asked for it. ****** ISAS ****** DOES you listen to your corner they are telling you to go for the KO and you lose the 12th round???? You complain about fouls to only find deaf ears then you blantantly foul in front of the reff??? ****** he should have used what he had which was every adavantage physically and put it on the guy....lefty

          Comment

          • S A M U R A I
            Bulletproof
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 181694
            • 1,495
            • 1,324
            • 1,419,318

            #25
            Originally posted by poet682006
            People are ******. Londoners voted for Ken "Red" Livingstone, an open Communist, for mayor. And Pommies routinely vote for the Labour party

            Poet
            Come on, Poet, you don't know **** about England. You have no idea about the alternatives to Ken Livingstone or the Labour Party, or what Thatcher did to Britain and the way it's still suffering now. Clearly, you shouldn't speak on British politics.



            100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

            Comment

            • DrewWoodside
              Lifestyle..Regular!
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 9244
              • 317
              • 590
              • 16,453

              #26
              Originally posted by slimshandy69
              I ve heard it all

              "allan green a rival to dirrell hence why he thought froch won"

              "primetime dont want to ruin the tournament hence why they didnt think dirrell won"

              "dirrells reacts different to gloves hece why his face was a mess"(even though hes never been bloodied in any other of his fights...)

              "ea5t5ide boxing prefer euros hence why they thought froch won"

              "the ringside press were all british hence why they thought froch won"

              "the judges were corrupted"(even though timothy bradley won by decision in nottingham against witter...


              Keep the seething excuses coming...yoiu all know deep in your hearts froch is schooling you yanks...
              Who gives a **** what Allan Green thinks.

              Comment

              • Bryght
                Contender
                • Feb 2004
                • 209
                • 17
                • 0
                • 6,478

                #27
                Do you know what's more hilarious? That yet another limey is on a public forum who has no idea how to spell simple words. It must be tough to have the IQ of a g****fruit.

                Comment

                • gqjohnb
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 1577
                  • 33
                  • 8
                  • 7,781

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Roy O'Bannon
                  People are ******. At one point 95% of the country backed George W. Bush.
                  Not that this is a political website but I'd like to see the imaginary article with Bush having a 95% approval rating.

                  Comment

                  • Poet682006
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 17924
                    • 1,181
                    • 1,350
                    • 26,849

                    #29
                    Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                    Come on, Poet, you don't know **** about England. You have no idea about the alternatives to Ken Livingstone or the Labour Party, or what Thatcher did to Britain and the way it's still suffering now. Clearly, you shouldn't speak on British politics.
                    I refer you back to the poster who thinks he can speak on AMERICAN politics. As for alternatives, a rotten carcass would be preferable to a Communist. And I know quite a bit about Labour: They're Socialists, 'nuff said.

                    Poet

                    Comment

                    • The_Visitation
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 1570
                      • 49
                      • 24
                      • 7,791

                      #30
                      Originally posted by poet682006
                      And I know quite a bit about Labour: They're Socialists, 'nuff said.

                      You know ****; the Labour party hasn't even been vaguely socialist in 15 years.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP