Glen's been on the bad side of many a shifty decision, though I don't think the fight with Dawson was one of them. Either could be called the winner in that fight, it happened to go to Dawson.
Glen Johnson Says "Andre Dirrell Beat Carl Froch"
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
-
thats how i scored it..............
the only thing was, when i was watching it, i knew by dirrell's fight demeanor, he was going to lose on the cards, because he basically fought scared, like they mentioned on air about the stephens fight. i think that his defensive choices lead to dirrell not getting rounds by the judges, but the scores of the 2 judges were complete horse ****, either way for froch or dirrell.Comment
-
If that's the case why was Dawson occasionally landing body shots, the uppercut and the straight left? Although Johnson was blocking Dawson's jab a lot, but he didn't block every punch that Dawson threw.Comment
-
i felt like dirrell won the fight too. Froch didn't land a single clean shot or hardly any shots for all the fight. He came forward but was ineffective. He couldn't stop Dirrell greatest asset in lateral movement and got countered all night long. Even when dirrell started standing in front of him, he did nothing. i hate to say robbery, but this was a robbery. And I finished watching the fight thinking that Young Americans without a name, prolly shouldn't go overseas. I felt kinda insulted as a fan, moreso than the Diaz/Malignaggi fight. That fight was way more closer than that fight on Sat., just a shame!Comment

Comment