Dirrell – Froch showcased the two worst types of boxers available

**KittenFlaps** · 10-19-2009, 09:24 AM

Dirrell needed that loss. Now he wont worry about losing that 0. I bet you'll see him become a pretty big factor in the division.

Froch is about done.

**flyest1** · 10-19-2009, 10:10 AM

Even though I know Dirrell won that fight easily. Dirrell is about to be a beast. He will probably have a chip on his shoulder everytime he fights now. Sort of like Hop win he lost to Jones the first time.

Froch is a poor version of Margo. Margo's skill level is way better than Froch's. So that should tell you how I feel about him. He is overrated as a pressure fighter and can't cut the ring for ****.

**BetterCallSaul** · 10-19-2009, 10:13 AM

Originally posted by The Dice

Dirrell

I think Dirrell is a top boxer; however he runs too much and doesn't want to engage in a brawl. He fights scared and worries about getting hit. I think Dirrell lacks some toughness. He is safety first fighter who doesn't care about crowd entertainment

Froch
Froch is a dead straight warrior. However, he style is too one dimensional and fights extremely ******. He doesn't have gameplan and relies on his power and chin to get him through a fight, if these fails he is done. His style isn't much fun to watch

that been said. I think Ward and Kessler are much complete boxers who have more talent than both of these guys and will give us a great fight hopefully

Watch Froch vs Pascal. Froch is great to watch. Defensive slick fighters like Dirrell and Taylor make him look mad.

**gdub27** · 10-19-2009, 10:46 AM

I thought the fight could've went to Dirrell but he wasn't robbed. I like how he took the loss, he'll be a better fighter for it. Froch has a very ugly unorthadox style that works for him but I don't think he can beat AA or Kessler. I do want to see Froch vs AA, two guys with pop and a lot of willpower.

Dirrell – Froch showcased the two worst types of boxers available