Originally posted by mikedb1984
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I don't think the Taylor loss was as bad as it appeared
Collapse
-
-
I don't think Taylor looked good at all. He was losing easily on my scorecard and the only reason he was in the fight at all is because that's just how Abraham is. He makes it look ugly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostHe's got some skills, but between being ko'd by AA, Frock and Pav.......how do you get back on track? I think it was different when guys fought 6, 7, 8 times a year and could just jump back on the horse. 2 or 3 times a year just gives a guy to much time to keep doubting himself. Just my opinion, of course.
Skillwise and technical ability,he is tops,but his problems block him from going back to champion status.I wish him all the best whatever he decides,he is a talented and honourable guy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostI don't think Taylor looked good at all. He was losing easily on my scorecard and the only reason he was in the fight at all is because that's just how Abraham is. He makes it look ugly.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Blairhoyle792 View PostDirrell will beat him because he will be on his bike all night scared to get hit.
btw-I had Dirrell beatting Froch comfortably....He is a damn fine up and comer, just give him a few years-he's still very young and has the balls to go against these seasoned beasts.
Comment
-
JT is done!!!.....haven't seen the fight on TV yet but I was there live.....and from what I saw without commentary to help influence my thoughts....JT is done!!....his jab tapped and didnt snap......he looked flat....didnt throw too many right hands.......fought a spirited fight but the FIGHT in this WARRIOR was beat out a while ago!!.....shame!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by damned1974 View PostHell-I would fight that way if I was him-it's the only way his style will get past Abraham.Dirrell is fast as a cat,if he could step to the side and pound hooks into Abrahams temples,he could find success-the problem is,he may need to bring a sledgehammer-lol
btw-I had Dirrell beatting Froch comfortably....He is a damn fine up and comer, just give him a few years-he's still very young and has the balls to go against these seasoned beasts.
at the minute all I saw was a man content to jab and run.
as the commentator said after the fight "to take a world title not only do you have to win, but you have to win big"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blairhoyle792 View Postif he beats the likes of Kessler or Abraham convincingly and in the manner that you suggest then I may take to him.
at the minute all I saw was a man content to jab and run.
as the commentator said after the fight "to take a world title not only do you have to win, but you have to win big"
All you seen was a man happy to jab and run( Dirrell),but he did land some combos whereas Froch threw mostly air punches-how do you reward the champ who landed less punches and couldn't find a way to skillfully beat a novice? I did watch the fight with Bunce and other British commentery,and found it funny that they believed Dirrell to win,then after the decision they did a 180 and said '"you have to win big,etc"
My take is-fighters should be rewarded on controlled and effective aggression, Froch moved forward,swung wild and missed most punches,played into Dirrell's style which left him frustrated,only landed a few punches and even at one point got hurt by Dirrell.Dirrell was able to impose his fight on Froch (it may not be exciting,but its his style),dodge Froch at will,and dictate the pace (moving forwards should make no difference in scoring-its punches)...
Comment
Comment