Comments Thread For: Three for the show: Katie Taylor edges Amanda Serrano again

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lefty0616
    replied
    I thought that Serrano won a very carefully fought fight by a comfortable margin. While the first two fights could have gone either way, she got robbed this time.

    Leave a comment:


  • CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart
    replied
    If anyone watched it that was just giving boxing a chance , they definitely won't become fans because of the main event. Hopefully they caught the prelims and the undercard.

    Leave a comment:


  • countmorbida
    replied
    Why is the photo for this article showing the second fight?

    Leave a comment:


  • damned1974
    replied
    Originally posted by turnedup

    get out of here with that bullshhh you can’t rightfully find 3 rounds to actually give Serrano.
    Can't find 3 rounds to even give anyone tbh-it was so bad. Taylor won-Serrano fought so dumb-didnt even try to close distance before throwing and didn't have a plan B which would have been to revert to her old form to attack...it was a disgrace.

    Leave a comment:


  • turnedup
    replied
    Originally posted by LAchargers373
    I thought Serrano edged the 1st fight won the 2nd clearly but this fight was a clear cut Taylor victory. 97-93 was **** on. It was as clear and Serrano winning the 2nd fight which was pretty easy to call as was this fight
    Of course you did…considering you always think the Latino fighter won and I say that as a Latino myself, the only actually one of these three fights anyone could make an actual factual argument for Serrano was the second fight..

    Leave a comment:


  • turnedup
    replied
    Originally posted by White-Bob
    Robbery. The great white hope will live forever etched in the minds of part timers as an ATG due to the fu.ckery of the judges
    get out of here with that bullshhh you can’t rightfully find 3 rounds to actually give Serrano.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardt
    replied
    This looked like a fight with aging fighters who weren't interested in each other anymore and why the hell was Serrano throwing combinations like she was shadowboxing at the air, WTF?

    Leave a comment:


  • damned1974
    replied
    Originally posted by D3v1Ld0g

    A nap had more value than wasting time on this fight. You won tonight.
    LOL so god damn true.

    Leave a comment:


  • damned1974
    replied
    Originally posted by CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart


    You didn't miss a thing. It was the first nothing round replayed nine more times. The " fight" was garbage , they both deserved to lose.
    100%...the worst fight of the night. It had me hanging for rewatching Haney vs Ramirez.

    Leave a comment:


  • damned1974
    replied
    Originally posted by r.burgundy

    Serrano was crap but taylor wasnt looking like sugar ray robinson either lol
    I get it, but Taylor was just a hair better because she made Serrano fall into her gameplan...If Serrano quit shadow boxing and brought the energy of the first 2 fights she would have won, but she didn't even try to close distance-it was embarrassing as a fart upon meeting the future in-laws.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
TOP