calzaghe flailing like a octupus vs froch winging like a drunken bum...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #11
    Who is a better slow dancer? Dirrell or Hopkins?

    Comment

    • Dynamite Kid
      Slicker than your average
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2007
      • 20701
      • 627
      • 209
      • 38,291

      #12
      I dont think Joe deserved to beat Hopkins either, that said i dont think Hopkins deserved the win either, it should of been a draw, However Dirrell was more effective than Hopkins was throughout!! the fight, that alone tells you how he cut off Froch's supply line and nullified his ability to get off or land.

      Comment

      • Leo Mayweather
        Up and Comer
        • Oct 2009
        • 88
        • 3
        • 1
        • 6,177

        #13
        Originally posted by daggum
        well he lost to one of those legends(43) and the other legend was clearly shot and hadn't won a meaningful fight in 5 years. cong****!
        Oh and there was me thinkin you were gonna come out with the over the hill excuse! Calzaghe was no spring chicken either

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43346
          • 4,516
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #14
          Originally posted by Leo Mayweather
          Oh and there was me thinkin you were gonna come out with the over the hill excuse! Calzaghe was no spring chicken either
          36 is younger than 43 not to mention he had easy fights his entire career.

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #15
            Originally posted by daggum
            well he lost to one of those legends(43) and the other legend was clearly shot and hadn't won a meaningful fight in 5 years. cong****! I hate Europeans, and I bash them whenever I can.
            Why do you hate Europeans, daggum?

            Comment

            • Leo Mayweather
              Up and Comer
              • Oct 2009
              • 88
              • 3
              • 1
              • 6,177

              #16
              Originally posted by daggum
              36 is younger than 43 not to mention he had easy fights his entire career.
              Here we go with the same bull****! he still won final end of
              how old was Pavlik when he got his ass handed to him by Hopkins? but Calzghe beats him and he's an old man in that situation bollocks

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #17
                Originally posted by billionaire
                vs hopkins and dirrell.....which looked worse....

                [img]http://i285.***********.com/albums/ll67/barobinson1/hopcalz-1.gif?t=1218784000[/img]
                Calzaghe won, rightly so. Froch won, wrongfully!

                Comment

                • freedom213
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 3388
                  • 112
                  • 164
                  • 10,016

                  #18
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  well he lost to one of those legends(43) and the other legend was clearly shot and hadn't won a meaningful fight in 5 years. cong****!

                  Im no Calzaghe fan but he is about 3 leagues above Froch.

                  Comment

                  • Leo Mayweather
                    Up and Comer
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 88
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    • 6,177

                    #19
                    Originally posted by freedom213
                    Im no Calzaghe fan but he is about 3 leagues above Froch.
                    Agree with froch not even being in Calzaghe's league

                    Comment

                    • S A M U R A I
                      Bulletproof
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 181694
                      • 1,495
                      • 1,324
                      • 1,419,318

                      #20
                      Calzaghe did the octopus thing with Jones as well, and other fighters. He tends to do that **** when the opponent is running, trying to bat them into position. Calzaghe fans will probably have noticed this, or anyone who's seen a good number of his fights. I've seen all but maybe 3.

                      Taking a 3 second gif from a 36 minute fight doesn't tell the story. I understand it's good for a chuckle, but it wears thin eventually. Anyone can take a couple of seconds where a fighter looks less than stellar, or even downright ******, and blow it out of proportion. But at the end of the day, to use a Calzaghe-ism, I don't see Slappy Joe losing to any current super middleweights and I think he deserved the nod over Hopkins.

                      Nobody, even if they hate Joe Calzaghe, should compare him to Carl Froch, their styles are far, far apart and Calzaghe is in a whole different class. Both happen to have fought against some of the most elusive fighters in the business, so you gotta expect them to miss when the opponent gets on his bike. Try shooting a fast moving target with a *******. It isn't easy.



                      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP