Any Americans think Froch won?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pullcounter
    no guts no glory
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 42582
    • 549
    • 191
    • 49,739

    #11
    Originally posted by P4P Opinion
    Some of the scoring on this site is absolutely laughable. If you gave it to Dirrell you don't know how to score a fight. For the first half of the fight he landed absolutely nothing while showing no aggression and eating jabs all round. He absolutely deserved to lose a point for excessive clinching. He stunk nearly the entire fight out. The boy has no right to be fighting at this level with his attitude.
    WTF was you watching???? Froch barely landed any jab and abandoned his jab!!!!

    Comment

    • zojo
      Banned
      • Feb 2009
      • 393
      • 71
      • 61
      • 499

      #12
      I watched the fight again and showtime were definatly a bit biased towards andre dirrell by getting over excited evey time he jabbed and ignoring the many hard shots froch landed throughout the fight.

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #13
        Originally posted by mr tricky
        im british and was suporting froch and wanted him to knock direll out , however i thogut dirrel deserved the win, however do any Americans out there think froch deserved the victory?
        Good question, not sure if any Americans think Froch won, but there are alot of Europeans who think Dirrell won.

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #14
          Originally posted by `STEELHEAD
          i had froch winning 115-114.
          if dirrell didnt have a point deducted i would of had it a draw
          but would of felt bad if it was because of the way dirrell ran.
          Who got to you? You used to be such a good lad.

          Comment

          • Pugilistic™
            MV3
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 9848
            • 324
            • 305
            • 16,773

            #15
            I personally don't know how anyone can have Froch winning.

            Dirrell landed the cleaner shots and was busier in most of the fight.

            If the fight wasn't in Nottingham, Dirrell would of won.

            Comment

            • P4P Opinion
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 1778
              • 143
              • 73
              • 8,170

              #16
              Originally posted by Pullcounter
              WTF was you watching???? Froch barely landed any jab and abandoned his jab!!!!
              First five rounds he landed solid jabs. I agree that he abandoned it later in the fight out of frustration at Dirrell's absolute insistence on not throwing punches. Dirrell could have won the fight if he'd decided to engage as he proved in the final rounds. Too little, too late.

              Comment

              • Sick/
                Banned
                • Feb 2009
                • 11284
                • 554
                • 866
                • 14,892

                #17
                Running around the ring like a little girl and ducking aint no skill. Dirrell is a *****

                Comment

                • -MAKAVELLI-
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 50080
                  • 3,580
                  • 2,792
                  • 169,000

                  #18
                  honestly, they're both garbage

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #19
                    Originally posted by P4P Opinion
                    First five rounds he landed solid jabs. I agree that he abandoned it later in the fight out of frustration at Dirrell's absolute insistence on not throwing punches. Dirrell could have won the fight if he'd decided to engage as he proved in the final rounds. Too little, too late.
                    come on!!!

                    Crotch didn't land his jab, that's why he abandoned it!

                    Originally posted by -PlaT_NuM-
                    Running around the ring like a little girl and ducking aint no skill. Dirrell is a *****
                    lolz... so Crotch got beat by a *****... so what's that make Crotch?

                    Comment

                    • Sick/
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 11284
                      • 554
                      • 866
                      • 14,892

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Pullcounter
                      come on!!!

                      Crotch didn't land his jab, that's why he abandoned it!



                      lolz... so Crotch got beat by a *****... so what's that make Crotch?
                      Carl won a SD. did you miss the fight?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP