round by round websites gave fight to direll

**NorvernRob** · 10-18-2009, 02:26 PM

Originally posted by eSe

fanhouse.com and usatoday.com both gave the fight to direll

sorry cant post links

The judges didn't.

**catalinul** · 10-18-2009, 02:27 PM

Interestingly Rafael gave it to Froch by 1 point.

**REMOVED SHARK 97** · 10-18-2009, 02:29 PM

Froch won, end.

**The_Visitation** · 10-18-2009, 02:37 PM

Originally posted by catalinul

Interestingly Rafael gave it to Froch by 1 point.

Odd that, with it folks here telling us it's so obvious to any sort of 'boxing fan' that Froch couldn't possibly have won more than three rounds.

I guess he must be 'corrupt'.

**mojack** · 10-18-2009, 02:43 PM

Originally posted by eSe

fanhouse.com and usatoday.com both gave the fight to direll

sorry cant post links

What?!!?? that can't be true. 2 biased American magazines pointing for the American fighter?

GETT OUTTA HHEEEURRR!!!

**swizz** · 10-18-2009, 02:44 PM

Originally posted by catalinul

Interestingly Rafael gave it to Froch by 1 point.

i was just onn espn.com didnt see the article?

**catalinul** · 10-18-2009, 02:47 PM

Originally posted by swizz

i was just onn espn.com didnt see the article?

I heard it fro msome guy he had it 114-113 Froch.

Can't vouch for it.

**THe TRiNiTY** · 10-18-2009, 02:57 PM

Why is it that I see the same British/Hatton fans who complained for months about the outcome/officiating of the Mayweather fight, trying to end discussions about Froch/Dirrell every chance they get?

And Mayweather stopped him. Lol. Interesting.

round by round websites gave fight to direll