The media thoughts on the froch verses dirrell fight..

[slimshandy69]

With that logic it seems you must be admitting old man Hopkins owned Calzaghe.....

he did...calslappe lost that fight...

[FreshOutOfHell]

Froch doesn't have the defense to deal with Abraham or Kessler.

[Tom_Tocca]

The German press is talking of a controversial, close decision win by Froch...lots of them saw the fight for Direll as well as the German commentator. Though, they said that the fight could have gone either way and a draw might be the most legitimized verdict...

[slimshandy69]

The German press is talking of a controversial, close decision win by Froch...lots of them saw the fight for Direll as well as the German commentator. Though, they said that the fight could have gone either way and a draw might be the most legitimized verdict...

so thats not controvertial then...

Not one person has come up with a legitermite rerason to me why dirrell even deserved a split loss decision yesterday...imo all three judges should have froch winning by at least 3 rounds...

My sig shows froch landing better shots...dirrells face was a mess, froch was perfect...

Farochg nwas landing jabs all night while dirrell ran like mad...

[Chunk..]

like how all your links are from the UK

RTE isn't UK.

[steeluv]

Carl Froch won 114-113 on my card.

The decision was fair, I'm even happy to see it was a SD instead of a UD because the fight was very close.

Yes, Dirrell is the more talented fighter, but his game plan STUNK. Fighters who run, fall, hold, bend and ***** for 12 rounds don't deserve to win world titles.

Agreed, plus in the end of the fight, Dirells face looked worse of Froch looked like he could have gone for a photo shoot
Decision could have gone either way, but dirrell stinks he came to avoid a fight, will be interesting to when Abrahams fights him, one of them will have to fight

Kessler or Abraham gong to win i fink

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

How can you say Dirrell was pathetic, if that's the case, then Froch was just complete ****. HE FAILED big time.

Check my posts and you'll see I make no great claim for Froch's performance. His limitations were well known before the fight, though.



I'm talking about Dirrell's performance, and the misguided notion that it represented some kind of masterclass in defensive boxing. It was poor, not slick, poor.

[swizz]

blanked by the yanks and calzaghe boys..

hey werent you the same guy the said you cant score a round 9-9 that someone must have a 10?

[swizz]

froch loss on espn aol esideboxing yahoo and some people on sky ll but one which was bruce had dirrell winning

[oaklandstephen]

if u get a split decision in ur hometown than u know u lost the fight.