Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Congratulations to Inoue for proving he's the greatest Asian boxer of all time. Sorry Pacquiao, your time’s up and your legacy just got overshadowed

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Century Tuna View Post

    Terence won’t ever be Mayweather dominant? Bro, you sound like you just woke up from a 2015 coma. Crawford murdered the supposed boogeyman of the division in Errol Spence and made it look like light sparring, that’s dominance you can’t fake. Meanwhile, you're clinging to pound-for-pound rankings like they’re gospel when half of them are media politics and fanboy bias. Usyk’s great, sure, but Crawford's putting on clinics so clean they belong in textbooks. Mayweather fought safe; Crawford finishes. If you can’t see that, maybe combat sports ain’t for you, stick to TikTok dance rankings.
    Crawford's ww resume is weak at best

    Spence is the only guy but you can argue he was not right after the car accident and he fought that way; could barely keep his balance

    Sorry but Madrimov at 154 a 16 fight unknown was not a "clinic" we'll put that in the category of barely squeaked by

    Canelo is shopworn and beating him at this stage is a decent win at best
    Last edited by djtmal; 05-06-2025, 08:07 AM.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Century Tuna View Post

      Lmao, "not close to Pacquiao"? Bro, Pacquiao built his resume fighting washed names with asterisk wins padded by catchweights and politics. Legends? More like legends on retirement tours. Meanwhile, Inoue is out here dominating prime, undefeated champs across divisions with surgical precision not scraping by with split decisions or headbutting brawls. The only thing Pac had over Inoue was hype and a machine pushing his narrative. If Inoue’s two KDs don’t matter to you, then Pac getting bullied by Jeff Horn and KO’d cold by Marquez should matter even less. Inoue doesn’t need to "sniff" the conversation he already passed the smell test. Your nostalgia goggles just smell like denial.
      Eh?
      Pac 27 - Morales 29
      Pac 25 - JMM 30
      Pac 28 - Barrera 33
      Pac 29 - ODH 35
      Pac 30 - Hatton 30
      Pac 30 - Cotto 29

      What retirement tours, besides Oscar, who the year before that had a close fight vs. Floyd?

      Inoue is great, and him moving up to Jr FW is a huge accomplishment.. but Pac had literally same measurements (5'5, 67" reach), started at the same weight as Inoue, and he fought majority of his fights at LW through WW.

      I have a feeling this thread has more to do with Pac hate than Inoue love.
      El_Mero El_Mero The D3vil The D3vil like this.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by djtmal View Post

        Crawford's ww resume is weak at best

        Spence is the only guy but you can argue he was not right after the car accident and he fought that way; could barely keep his balance

        Sorry but Madrimov at 154 a 16 fight unknown was not a "clinic" we'll put that in the category of barely squeaked by

        Canelo is shopworn and beating him at this stage is a decent win at best
        So let’s get this straight — you're calling Crawford's welterweight résumé "weak"? He didn’t just beat everyone at 147, he embarrassed them. He stopped every single opponent in that division. Not edged them. Not squeaked by. Stopped. Them. All.

        He was the first and only guy to stop Shawn Porter, a dog in the ring who gave Spence and Thurman life-or-death wars. Crawford made him look like a sparring partner.

        Then there's Kell Brook, former champ, who got folded in four rounds. That’s faster than Spence, by the way, so if Spence’s win was celebrated, what do you call Crawford’s? A public execution?

        Jeff Horn? Yeah, the guy who "beat" Pacquiao. Crawford crossed the ocean and bullied him in his backyard like he owed him lunch money.

        So no, his resume isn’t "weak." It's just so dominant, you clowns can’t tell if his opponents were bad or if Crawford’s just levels above.​

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Century Tuna View Post

          So let’s get this straight — you're calling Crawford's welterweight résumé "weak"? He didn’t just beat everyone at 147, he embarrassed them. He stopped every single opponent in that division. Not edged them. Not squeaked by. Stopped. Them. All.

          He was the first and only guy to stop Shawn Porter, a dog in the ring who gave Spence and Thurman life-or-death wars. Crawford made him look like a sparring partner.

          Then there's Kell Brook, former champ, who got folded in four rounds. That’s faster than Spence, by the way, so if Spence’s win was celebrated, what do you call Crawford’s? A public execution?

          Jeff Horn? Yeah, the guy who "beat" Pacquiao. Crawford crossed the ocean and bullied him in his backyard like he owed him lunch money.

          So no, his resume isn’t "weak." It's just so dominant, you clowns can’t tell if his opponents were bad or if Crawford’s just levels above.​
          Lol. You acting like he ran thru a murderers row of ww's

          Good job lining up everybody's leftovers
          Last edited by djtmal; 06-08-2025, 10:57 AM.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by djtmal View Post

            Crawford's ww resume is weak at best

            Spence is the only guy but you can argue he was not right after the car accident and he fought that way; could barely keep his balance

            Sorry but Madrimov at 154 a 16 fight unknown was not a "clinic" we'll put that in the category of barely squeaked by

            Canelo is shopworn and beating him at this stage is a decent win at best
            Not a ginger fan but bud beating him is a huge win and cements him in the history books.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Century Tuna View Post

              So let’s get this straight — you're calling Crawford's welterweight résumé "weak"? He didn’t just beat everyone at 147, he embarrassed them. He stopped every single opponent in that division. Not edged them. Not squeaked by. Stopped. Them. All.

              He was the first and only guy to stop Shawn Porter, a dog in the ring who gave Spence and Thurman life-or-death wars. Crawford made him look like a sparring partner.

              Then there's Kell Brook, former champ, who got folded in four rounds. That’s faster than Spence, by the way, so if Spence’s win was celebrated, what do you call Crawford’s? A public execution?

              Jeff Horn? Yeah, the guy who "beat" Pacquiao. Crawford crossed the ocean and bullied him in his backyard like he owed him lunch money.

              So no, his resume isn’t "weak." It's just so dominant, you clowns can’t tell if his opponents were bad or if Crawford’s just levels above.​
              There's a reason pbc blackballed him for years!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by El_Mero View Post

                Not a ginger fan but bud beating him is a huge win and cements him in the history books.
                I disagree Canelo isn't in his prime anymore. Nothing but a money grab imo

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP