The Americans are doing themselves discredit
Collapse
-
Did u read the previous posts or not?Remember boxing fans... THE MOMENT YOU STOP SCORING YOU STOP WINNING.
Point is, regardless of whatever else Dirrell was doing he was scoring and Froch wasn't. I know of no circumstances where you can win a fight without scoring effectively. Unless, of course, you're a Euro fighting in Europe and all objective criteria for scoring a fight gets thrown out the window and the judges just give it to the hometown boy regardless of what is actually going on the ring.
Poet
U dont win by running against a champion.
U wanna be a champ... take the title away from the champ.
Lastly you Americans are only making urselves look like clowns whining robbery here and there when in the first place Dirrell didn't fight.
He came to run and steal a victory which is CHEAP.
Challengers have a duty to take it to the champ or else the champ wins by default... thats a tradition in boxing that will never changeComment
-
You don't stay champion by not scoring against your challenger.
You want to stay champ... keep your title by beating your challenger.
You Euros are only making yourselves look like clowns whinging about Americans all the time. Americans this Americans that. You got Americans on the brain. By contrast Americans don't normally think of Euros at all: We only concern ourselves with people and countries that are actually important.
Froch stole a victory without landing anything of significance against his challenger which is CHEAP.
Champion and Challenger alike have an equal duty to WIN the fight. When they step into that ring there is no champion and there is no challenger anymore: It's two fighters with equal standing both fighting for the right to hold that belt. The belt is left outside the ring and is awarded to the objective winner of fight and whoever wore that belt down to the ring should have no bearing on the outcome of the fight.
PoetComment
-
I don't care what 3rd world **** hole you come from not scoring still doesn't keep a championship. You want to win? Land some punches! Moving forward and giving your opponent mean looks doesn't win you ****e. You win with punches not with scowls.
PoetComment
-
Again dude... RUnning won't win you championships.
That's basic common sense.
These pampered American dudes who think they can steal a pie... they wont win by running.
SRR was not a runner so does Ali.
If u run u lose. That's basic.
In boxing u can use movement without disengaging.
If you dont know that u dnt know boxing.
Boxing is not a sprint contest btw
As for the third world comment... dude have more education. There is no such thing as a 3rd world country nor a first... lols!Last edited by joartcc5; 10-18-2009, 01:24 PM.Comment
-
Again dude... Not scoring won't keep your championship.
That's basic common sense.
These simpering Euros who think they can keep a championship without scoring... they won't keep it by not landing punches.
If you don't land punches you lose. That's basic.
Apparently you don't know boxing since you think you can win a fight without scoring on your opponent.
Boxing is about scoring more effectively than your opponent btw. Period. End of story.
Obviously spoken by the butt hurt resident of a 3rd world ****hole.
PoetComment
-
There's already a poll on here asking who won and it was 71% Dirrell won to 20% Froch won and 9% a Draw.
That is of course the last time i saw it, i don't know how it is now.
I am not American or black or even biased to black fighters or UK fighter hater, but Dirrell won the damn fight and you all are defending this **** decision.
n:
Comment
Comment