Froch defeats Dirrell, sounds delusional afterwards

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chr0nic
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 4501
    • 191
    • 213
    • 5,494

    #1

    Froch defeats Dirrell, sounds delusional afterwards

    By Scott Gilfoid: It looks as if World Boxing Council super middleweight champion Carl Froch (26-0, 20 KO’s) needs to have his head checked out after beating American Andre Dirrell (18-1, 13 KO’s) by a 12 round split decision tonight at the Trent FM Arena, Nottingham. Froch, 32, who looked positively awful and appeared to lose the fight by at least eight rounds on my scorecard, had this to say about the fight: “I definitely felt like I won from round 1 through round 12. I’m not 100% satisfied because I like to feel like I won the fight and I feel like I could go in there another 12 rounds and still beat Dirrell.”
    Say what, Froch? You think you won all 12 rounds of the fight? Wow! I hope they take Froch to the nearest hospital and have his head thoroughly checked out to make sure nothing was knocked loose up there. I know Froch has always been kind of a confident person, maybe too confident when judging his own talent if you ask me. But for him to say that he felt that he won all 12 rounds, it leaves me with the impression that Dirrell beat him even worse than I originally thought. Froch is really dreaming.
    He needs to sit down, take it easy, have a beer and put his glasses on and watch the fight without the TV sound on. If he listens to the Nottingham fans going nutty after every punch that he misses, Froch might get a wrong impression and think he’s doing better than he actually was. We want Froch to face reality here and he won’t get a good a look at the fight if he’s listening to his home crowd cheering him on for every punch he throws.
    Froch took a beating in the fight, especially in the later rounds when he was staggered twice by Dirrell. Out of frustration, Froch started fouling like no tomorrow, body slamming Dirrell, punching him in the back of the head and other related nastiness. Needless to say, it didn’t leave Froch looking good for those who saw the Super Six fight around the world. It never looks good when a fighter has to resort to fouling when they’re getting out-boxed.
    I really hope that Froch doesn’t think he impressed the American audience – or even the British public – with his performance. Froch didn’t look good, not on defense or offense. Froch especially looked horrid on defense as he was tagged with every punch that Dirrell had a desire to throw. Granted, Dirrell obviously moved a little too much, but he was out-boxing Froch like a replica of Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Muhammad Ali.
    It was beautiful boxing, and almost a perfect performance. If you could take away the clinching and the movement late in the fight – a factor that cost Dirrell when he was docked a point for holding too much late in the bout – Dirrell would have been sensational. As it was, he still won by at least eight rounds.
    So Froch thinks he could have gone another 12 rounds and still beaten Dirrell. I hate to break this to Froch, but he was getting dominated in the final rounds and was hurt twice in the last couple of rounds. Had the fight gone another three rounds, Froch would have likely been taken out. He sure wasn’t going to win those rounds. Dirrell was serving him up at the end.
    That is so sad that Froch thinks that he could have gone 12 more rounds. Yeah, dude, you could have gone more rounds but you would have lost all of them, so what’s the point? You got your gift decision so you need to be happy about it and not get a little too carried away with making more out of it then what it was. It sounds like a serious case of delusions of grandeur. Froch stunk up the joint with his fouling and his inability to get out of the way of Dirrell’s shots. No hand speed, no defense and movement like an old plow horse. That was some god awful boxing from Froch. He might as well been in an MMA fight because the way he was fighting with his body slams and other fouls, he would been perfect for UFC.
  • MIP4P1
    Banned
    • Sep 2009
    • 328
    • 26
    • 0
    • 391

    #2
    Someone put a bullet into this clown already.

    Comment

    • Freddy Krueger
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 5596
      • 159
      • 213
      • 6,618

      #3
      Crotch got outboxed two fights in a row, and his accuracy horrible.

      Comment

      • BetterCallSaul
        Shot!
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 9026
        • 598
        • 681
        • 16,488

        #4
        Seriously, the Americans are getting a bit hateful. Most British/Euro media have this down a close fight that could have gone either way. Most American media sources have Dirrell winning by a landslide and calling robbery...disgraceful. I was at the fight and had a perfect view. Froch controlled the first half of the fight with his jab while Dirrell mostly ran and spoiled. Dirrell came on strong late on, and does have a case for winning the fight, but IMO Froch did enough to keep his title. A draw was probably the correct result, but there is no way in hell Dirrell deserved to walk away with a victory and the WBC belt.

        Comment

        • Freddy Krueger
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 5596
          • 159
          • 213
          • 6,618

          #5
          Even the biased Brit announcers who choke on Froch's fireman had Dirrell winning. I can't wait until they get the British fight up of this fight so I can snapshot the score the brits had Dirrell winning.

          Comment

          • KESSLER
            GOONER FOR LIFE
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2007
            • 15487
            • 782
            • 716
            • 24,000

            #6
            Originally posted by Chr0nic
            By Scott Gilfoid: It looks as if World Boxing Council super middleweight champion Carl Froch (26-0, 20 KO’s) needs to have his head checked out after beating American Andre Dirrell (18-1, 13 KO’s) by a 12 round split decision tonight at the Trent FM Arena, Nottingham. Froch, 32, who looked positively awful and appeared to lose the fight by at least eight rounds on my scorecard, had this to say about the fight: “I definitely felt like I won from round 1 through round 12. I’m not 100% satisfied because I like to feel like I won the fight and I feel like I could go in there another 12 rounds and still beat Dirrell.”
            Say what, Froch? You think you won all 12 rounds of the fight? Wow! I hope they take Froch to the nearest hospital and have his head thoroughly checked out to make sure nothing was knocked loose up there. I know Froch has always been kind of a confident person, maybe too confident when judging his own talent if you ask me. But for him to say that he felt that he won all 12 rounds, it leaves me with the impression that Dirrell beat him even worse than I originally thought. Froch is really dreaming.
            He needs to sit down, take it easy, have a beer and put his glasses on and watch the fight without the TV sound on. If he listens to the Nottingham fans going nutty after every punch that he misses, Froch might get a wrong impression and think he’s doing better than he actually was. We want Froch to face reality here and he won’t get a good a look at the fight if he’s listening to his home crowd cheering him on for every punch he throws.
            Froch took a beating in the fight, especially in the later rounds when he was staggered twice by Dirrell. Out of frustration, Froch started fouling like no tomorrow, body slamming Dirrell, punching him in the back of the head and other related nastiness. Needless to say, it didn’t leave Froch looking good for those who saw the Super Six fight around the world. It never looks good when a fighter has to resort to fouling when they’re getting out-boxed.
            I really hope that Froch doesn’t think he impressed the American audience – or even the British public – with his performance. Froch didn’t look good, not on defense or offense. Froch especially looked horrid on defense as he was tagged with every punch that Dirrell had a desire to throw. Granted, Dirrell obviously moved a little too much, but he was out-boxing Froch like a replica of Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Muhammad Ali.
            It was beautiful boxing, and almost a perfect performance. If you could take away the clinching and the movement late in the fight – a factor that cost Dirrell when he was docked a point for holding too much late in the bout – Dirrell would have been sensational. As it was, he still won by at least eight rounds.
            So Froch thinks he could have gone another 12 rounds and still beaten Dirrell. I hate to break this to Froch, but he was getting dominated in the final rounds and was hurt twice in the last couple of rounds. Had the fight gone another three rounds, Froch would have likely been taken out. He sure wasn’t going to win those rounds. Dirrell was serving him up at the end.
            That is so sad that Froch thinks that he could have gone 12 more rounds. Yeah, dude, you could have gone more rounds but you would have lost all of them, so what’s the point? You got your gift decision so you need to be happy about it and not get a little too carried away with making more out of it then what it was. It sounds like a serious case of delusions of grandeur. Froch stunk up the joint with his fouling and his inability to get out of the way of Dirrell’s shots. No hand speed, no defense and movement like an old plow horse. That was some god awful boxing from Froch. He might as well been in an MMA fight because the way he was fighting with his body slams and other fouls, he would been perfect for UFC.
            Froch won! Pay up!

            Comment

            • Chr0nic
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 4501
              • 191
              • 213
              • 5,494

              #7
              Originally posted by timba1988
              Seriously, the Americans are getting a bit hateful. Most British/Euro media have this down a close fight that could have gone either way. Most American media sources have Dirrell winning by a landslide and calling robbery...disgraceful. I was at the fight and had a perfect view. Froch controlled the first half of the fight with his jab while Dirrell mostly ran and spoiled. Dirrell came on strong late on, and does have a case for winning the fight, but IMO Froch did enough to keep his title. A draw was probably the correct result, but there is no way in hell Dirrell deserved to walk away with a victory and the WBC belt.
              no disrespect but sayin ''ahh he did'nt win cuz he spoiled the fight by running'' is bull**** as your opponents does'nt get points for you running and spoiling the fight
              dirrell won, clearly
              and you gotta show me these articles where all these europeans are sayin froch won, cuz the commentators had froch losing and they are english
              i can only see the english saying froch won honestly
              we know how nationalistic you guys are

              Comment

              • BIGPOPPAPUMP
                Franchise Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2003
                • 46539
                • 2,259
                • 334
                • 5,493,285

                #8
                Originally posted by Chr0nic
                By Scott Gilfoid:
                I prefer this guy a lot more when he writes under his manuel perez monikor... well on second thought, maybe not. If you havent figured out the names are all fake and the bits are written for cheap heat, by a 14 year old kid no less, then you need to get your head examined.

                Comment

                • Ryn0
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 11139
                  • 310
                  • 269
                  • 20,767

                  #9
                  This fight wasn't close, Dirrell outlanded him in every single round. I had it 9-3

                  There wasn't a single round where more than 3 proper punches landed on Dirrell, Froch was getting tagged, missing and being made to look clumsy.

                  Comment

                  • Benncollinsaad
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 4210
                    • 98
                    • 40
                    • 4,773

                    #10
                    Originally posted by timba1988
                    Seriously, the Americans are getting a bit hateful. Most British/Euro media have this down a close fight that could have gone either way. Most American media sources have Dirrell winning by a landslide and calling robbery...disgraceful. I was at the fight and had a perfect view. Froch controlled the first half of the fight with his jab while Dirrell mostly ran and spoiled. Dirrell came on strong late on, and does have a case for winning the fight, but IMO Froch did enough to keep his title. A draw was probably the correct result, but there is no way in hell Dirrell deserved to walk away with a victory and the WBC belt.
                    Have they ever been anything else?? Please, you must see that its unfair. When Calzaghe beat Hopkins, you were saying the same thing as now. Why can't you be honest and give Euros some credit?!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP