How come when Hatton holds, UK ref allows, when Dirrell does he gets a point taken!
Collapse
-
Please check your facts. I dont think the judge was British, i may be wrong but iv never seen him before.Comment
-
Comment
-
americans need to get their own house in order before they start blabbering on about hometown robberies.
by the way, when is the diaz-paulie rematch?Comment
-
Comment
-
If you hold expect some rough stuff, like hatton once said it aint no tickling contest.
They cheat in America too.Because they cheat in England, ****ing home-cooking for their fighters. It was hilarious when the Biased Britisih announcers even had it for Dirrell. Crotch knows he lost, his ppl even told him he lost. I don't know how Crotch really thinks he won, you actually have to punch your opponent more then 4 times the entire fight.
The ref wasn't a Brit, please know you facts before talking **** next time. Thank You.Comment
-
Saying "It's part of Hatton's offense" doesn't make it any less illegal. But that's another story for another day.
Froch admitted after the fight he was purposely hitting Dirrell in the back of the head because it was "the only place available". That's not justification for blatantly cheating. I don't have a problem with Dirrell losing a point. I have a problem with Froch NOT losing a point.Comment
Comment