How come when Hatton holds, UK ref allows, when Dirrell does he gets a point taken!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • top7gun
    Banned
    • Sep 2009
    • 515
    • 86
    • 31
    • 1,620

    #11
    Originally posted by MIP4P1
    And how come Froch was allowed to repeatedly hit Dirrell behind the head without a point deduction.

    Fight was a SCAM.
    because they are both brits, the referee is a brit, the crowds brit, and the place is great britain....

    it's called homecourt advantage!

    Comment

    • The Dice
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 292
      • 46
      • 19
      • 369

      #12
      What Hatton did to Kostya, he should have been charged with ****

      Comment

      • adietheforestfa
        Forest till i die!
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 1443
        • 154
        • 320
        • 8,665

        #13
        Please check your facts. I dont think the judge was British, i may be wrong but iv never seen him before.

        Comment

        • shade darkar
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 6460
          • 227
          • 337
          • 12,996

          #14
          Originally posted by MIP4P1
          And how come Froch was allowed to repeatedly hit Dirrell behind the head without a point deduction.

          Fight was a SCAM.
          the ref wasnt from the UK by by the way. but i dunno, howcome US ref took point from hatton?

          Comment

          • ThePlugInBabies
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 105
            • 10
            • 4
            • 6,195

            #15
            americans need to get their own house in order before they start blabbering on about hometown robberies.

            by the way, when is the diaz-paulie rematch?

            Comment

            • shade darkar
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 6460
              • 227
              • 337
              • 12,996

              #16
              Originally posted by ThePlugInBabies
              americans need to get their own house in order before they start blabbering on about hometown robberies.

              by the way, when is the diaz-paulie rematch?
              lol, i like that!

              Comment

              • $partacus
                I'm SPARTACUS
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 4503
                • 248
                • 85
                • 11,373

                #17
                Originally posted by MIP4P1
                And how come Froch was allowed to repeatedly hit Dirrell behind the head without a point deduction.

                Fight was a SCAM.
                If you hold expect some rough stuff, like hatton once said it aint no tickling contest.

                Originally posted by Freddy Krueger
                Because they cheat in England, ****ing home-cooking for their fighters. It was hilarious when the Biased Britisih announcers even had it for Dirrell. Crotch knows he lost, his ppl even told him he lost. I don't know how Crotch really thinks he won, you actually have to punch your opponent more then 4 times the entire fight.
                They cheat in America too.

                Originally posted by top7gun
                because they are both brits, the referee is a brit, the crowds brit, and the place is great britain....

                it's called homecourt advantage!
                The ref wasn't a Brit, please know you facts before talking **** next time. Thank You.

                Comment

                • johnm is...
                  ****in *** Broads
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10700
                  • 820
                  • 1,382
                  • 48,813

                  #18
                  Saying "It's part of Hatton's offense" doesn't make it any less illegal. But that's another story for another day.

                  Froch admitted after the fight he was purposely hitting Dirrell in the back of the head because it was "the only place available". That's not justification for blatantly cheating. I don't have a problem with Dirrell losing a point. I have a problem with Froch NOT losing a point.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP