Comments Thread For: Why BoxingScene will not be at Chris Eubank Jnr-Conor Benn

[Left Hook Louie]

The drowning from an influx of radical Islam? You need to take that tin foil hat off old son. The UK is struggling because the multi millionaire’s/billionaire's are not paying their taxes and slowly bankrupting the government.

You needn't worry about tin foil hats.
Worry about your head being detached from your body courtesy of that keffiyeh-clad jihadi behind you with a machete. Yeah, on the streets of London, in fact.

Oh, nevermind. You don't see it coming so it won't hurt much.

[Left Hook Louie]

ah apparently I’m not allowed to say my previous comment. I was positing that you’ve created a whole conspiracy theory to explain the fact that white woman won’t have *** with you.

this is all the weird racism is ever about

Saudi sportswashing and their ownership and complete editorial control of The Ring is a conspiracy theory to you? Denial will only give you temporary respite from the hard truth.

Enjoy your dhimmi status if you're lucky enough to survive sharia.

[Coverdale]

Saudi sportswashing and their ownership and complete editorial control of The Ring is a conspiracy theory to you? Denial will only give you temporary respite from the hard truth.

Enjoy your dhimmi status if you're lucky enough to survive sharia.

What's the matter, are you not getting enough attention on Twitter, Gab, 'Truth' Social, etc?

It's not a boxing forum's fault you didn't get enough love as a child. Look to heal and leave the adults to discuss boxing please.

[Left Hook Louie]

What's the matter, are you not getting enough attention on Twitter, Gab, 'Truth' Social, etc?

It's not a boxing forum's fault you didn't get enough love as a child. Look to heal and leave the adults to discuss boxing please.

Ad hominem attacks such as yours will never win a debate.

Try answering the boxing question:

Saudi government sportswashing and their ownership and complete editorial control of The Ring is a conspiracy theory to you?

[Coverdale]

Ad hominem attacks such as yours will never win a debate.

Try answering the boxing question:

Saudi government sportswashing and their ownership and complete editorial control of The Ring is a conspiracy theory to you?

I wasn't attempting a 'debate', just questioning why you're bringing your alt-right talking points to a boxing forum.

No, it's not a conspiracy theory. Turki appears to be promoting his interests via the shell brand of The Ring. More concerning to me is that the WBA appear to have sanctioned another 'regular' belt for Garcia - Romero due to their relationship with Turki.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Typical ******* behaviour from a backward Arab.

Crazy how fas cist is censored.

[Left Hook Louie]

I wasn't attempting a 'debate', just questioning why you're bringing your alt-right talking points to a boxing forum.

No, it's not a conspiracy theory. Turki appears to be promoting his interests via the shell brand of The Ring. More concerning to me is that the WBA appear to have sanctioned another 'regular' belt for Garcia - Romero due to their relationship with Turki.

That's better.
Turki is just a functionary of the Saudi royal regime. None of this Riyadh Season sportswashing initiative is about him or his interests. Rather, the question to ask is, "what are the goals of the despotic Islamist regime sponsoring this effort and it's ideological underpinnings?"
Just asking the question. Ignore at your peril, but do enjoy the fights.

[vital1983]

BS will always be my go to. Keep up the good work.

[BoxerWriter]

ah that might explain the user name

Yeah, not very imaginative, but accurate!

[JeBron Lamez]

Aw, poor you.

Btw, and what did you expect? You are writing hit pieces after hit pieces about Sadi/Turki's involvement in boxing, but not a word about how corrupt the WBC and WBA are.

"(H)it pieces" or not, attempts at journalism are attempts at journalism & the negative criticism you offer, regardless of how scandalous it may be, doesn't devalue the attempts at journalism in the eyes of the uncorrupted &/or incredulous.