according to froch fans

[Sam D. Menace]

dirrell lost because he slipped punches, controlled the fight with ring generalship, and clinched frochs arms in other to prevent rabbit punches(like it's illiegal to clinch but not to rabbit punch)

yep, judges dont like you not lookin to have parkinsons or being punch drunk in the future, they dont wanna see a skillful boxing match, they wanna see a brawl

god knows a brawl is the only way carl could win fairly and even at that i doubt it would be in his favour

a bum and a paper champion, gonna get schooled by everyone in the tournament

[Sparked_1985]

dirrell lost because he slipped punches, controlled the fight with ring generalship, and clinched frochs arms in other to prevent rabbit punches(like it's illiegal to clinch but not to rabbit punch)

yep, judges dont like you not lookin to have parkinsons or being punch drunk in the future, they dont wanna see a skillful boxing match, they wanna see a brawl

god knows a brawl is the only way carl could win fairly and even at that i doubt it would be in his favour

a bum and a paper champion, gonna get schooled by everyone in the tournament

You spend 80% of the fight on the retreat you're going to find it hard to get a decision.....anywhere.

It's just the way it seems to be.

People are acting like Dirrell landed a lot of leather, he didn't.

He made Froch look ordinary, but JT already done that to more resounding affect that Dirrell. Dirrell was trying to steal the belt. He wasn't the dominant man, if he had stood infront of Froch a little more he would have won. On the rare occassions he did, Dirrell got off first.

[The_Visitation]

dirrell lost because he slipped punches, controlled the fight with ring generalship, and clinched frochs arms in other to prevent rabbit punches(like it's illiegal to clinch but not to rabbit punch)

Backpedalling and running away is not "controlling the fight with ring generalship"; if you really don't understand that try watching some B-Hop and Calzaghe fights sometime, not least against each other.

Dirrell lost because he didn't, quite, do enough positive things himself to take the title from the champ in his own backyard.

Dirrell indeed has skills, rather more than Froch, but just imagine Dirrell v. Dirrell. Far from being enthralled by a 'skillful boxing match' everyone would be asleep within three rounds. Defensive skills are great, but have to be matched with aggression.

[Sam D. Menace]

Backpedalling and running away is not "controlling the fight with ring generalship"; if you really don't understand that try watching some B-Hop and Calzaghe fights sometime, not least against each other.

Dirrell lost because he didn't, quite, do enough positive things himself to take the title from the champ in his own backyard.

Dirrell indeed has skills, rather more than Froch, but just imagine Dirrell v. Dirrell. Far from being enthralled by a 'skillful boxing match' everyone would be asleep within three rounds. Defensive skills are great, but have to be matched with aggression.

'positive'
'negative'

see, your mind ****ed by what froch said, your in serious denial
because froch says dirrell was'nt 'positive' enough, you believe him
he's hardly gonna be all ''i lost that fight big time, im a bum, my daddy penetrated me on several occasions''
is he now?

i never even seen/heard anyone use a ****** word like positive/negative with a boxing match

[mrbigshot]

dirrell won, he fought a controlled aggressive fight

[slimshandy69]

You spend 80% of the fight on the retreat you're going to find it hard to get a decision.....anywhere.

It's just the way it seems to be.

People are acting like Dirrell landed a lot of leather, he didn't.

He made Froch look ordinary, but JT already done that to more resounding affect that Dirrell. Dirrell was trying to steal the belt. He wasn't the dominant man, if he had stood infront of Froch a little more he would have won. On the rare occassions he did, Dirrell got off first.

if he fought froch he woud have got knocke dout because froch chin would have walked through it and froch has trmendous power...thats why he ran..


As for the fight...dirrells face wa s amess froch has no scratches on it...


IO was there live and froch landed continous jabs...hence why dirrells face wa sa mess...

Dirrell is a world class fighter though no doubt and i honeslty think froch will spark out kessler and abraham...

[Sam D. Menace]

if he fought froch he woud have got knocke dout because froch chin would have walked through it and froch has trmendous power...thats why he ran..


As for the fight...dirrells face wa s amess froch has no scratches on it...


IO was there live and froch landed continous jabs...hence why dirrells face wa sa mess...

Dirrell is a world class fighter though no doubt and i honeslty think froch will spark out kessler and abraham...

that's why from now on im ignoring your posts
dirrell hurt froch, froch never hurt dirrell

[Krakodil]

Dirrell lost because he fought like a COWARD, he runned and hugged all night like a ***** ass *****. and thats not the way to win a world title in europe in a guys hometown.

[slimshandy69]

.........