If Froch never landed anything then why was dirrells face all swollen and bleeding?

**Kiid Dynamite** · 10-18-2009, 05:14 AM

word lol...

**Sam D. Menace** · 10-18-2009, 05:15 AM

plaster of paris is a *****

i bet the ref knew about it but since carl lovers just love carl **** the ref just let it go

**BoxingChaos** · 10-18-2009, 05:19 AM

Originally posted by zojo

while froch didn't even have a scratch on him post fight. answer me you bias fat yanks

Because Dirrell was too busy running

Or too busy on his knees

**slimshandy69** · 10-18-2009, 05:33 AM

great thread...the reson why was froch was landing his cobra jab all night and actually boxed dirrell...dirrell landed such few shots...

**zojo** · 10-18-2009, 05:34 AM

Originally posted by Swirls

plaster of paris is a *****

i bet the ref knew about it but since carl lovers just love carl **** the ref just let it go

Dirrell got exposed as a *****. deal with it.

**ellwise69** · 10-18-2009, 05:45 AM

Originally posted by zojo

Dirrell got exposed as a *****. deal with it.

Nah man got to give credit where credit's due Dirrell's slick, and it was a close enough fight.

But he's still a *****.

**BEEHOP** · 10-18-2009, 05:50 AM

It's a good thing fights are scored on bloodied faces, or else Froch would have lost.

**Sam D. Menace** · 10-18-2009, 05:52 AM

Originally posted by BEEHOP

It's a good thing fights are scored on bloodied faces, or else Froch would have lost.

only if calzaghe-hopkins was in nottingham

**The Dice** · 10-18-2009, 05:54 AM

If Taylor-JCC went the distance. JCC should have gotten the nod becasue he wasn't bleeding and swollen

Comment