Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?
Collapse
-
I am only counting the ww losses, other than Ugas, because the question is about his ww resume bs another ww’s resume.
If Crawford had losses at ww I would factor them in.
Crawford had had a post prime career. You just will not admit it because you want past prime wins to count more to give Manny an edge.
Admitting Crawford was out of his prime gives him an edge because Porter and Spence are better wins than post prime Manny has.
The thread is only about his ww resume. Stay on topic.
He needs not to do that. He unified all 4 belts at ww. Manny failed to do so.Comment
-
Maybe you should compare his resume to illegalivweather. Two fighters who avoid threats in the division that should be goodLast edited by djtmal; 04-21-2025, 11:00 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Crawford unified ww then went up to 154. He need not drop back down.
Manny never unified at 147.
Manny ducked Crawford as well.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 04-21-2025, 11:07 AM.Comment
-
Yeah and specifically who had the better career, and Manny jumped his ww career off with a mega fight and fight after fight was mega ppv.
Crawford fought in obscurity up until his final at ww with Spence wtf are you talking about.
Whichever way you want to look at it, it's Manny Pacquiao and it's not even close
Last edited by djtmal; 04-21-2025, 11:28 AM.Comment
Comment