dirrell-froch referee...

**Nautilus** · 10-18-2009, 01:05 AM

This referee was unfair in that he only punished Dirrel. He should have taken one point away from Froch too for hitting behind the hand.

**Pullcounter** · 10-18-2009, 01:06 AM

Originally posted by #4#king

how can this guy justify taking a point from dirrell for holding, when froch threw direll to the mat, hit him in the back of the head at least five times, and held himself...

he has some serious explaining to do, IMO...it ultimately didnt factor into the result, i guess, because i guess judges dont watch the fight anymore...but it's just another reason this fight looks like it was fixed...

agreed... if he was going to take a point away for clinching he should've taken a point away from froch for fighting dirty

**Crazylegs77** · 10-18-2009, 01:10 AM

I was glad to see that Dirrell was deducted for holding
Froch should have been punished also for his tactics although Dirrell wasnt helping by turning his head to expose the back while holding at times.

**Freddy Krueger** · 10-18-2009, 01:12 AM

Originally posted by Crazylegs077

I was glad to see that Dirrell was deducted for holding
Froch should have been punished also for his tactics although Dirrell wasnt helping by turning his head to expose the back while holding at times.

Headlocks, throwing Dirrell down on the ground... Froch is such a warrior!

dirrell-froch referee...