Is this tourney good for boxing or.......

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rabbit ♠
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 3610
    • 169
    • 310
    • 4,528

    #1

    Is this tourney good for boxing or.......

    did the controversy of Dirrell/Froch do more harm than good.
    11
    helped
    54.55%
    6
    hurt
    45.45%
    5
  • NakiFan
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 6971
    • 435
    • 268
    • 9,796

    #2
    Nah its all good.

    Even if he did get robbed which he didnt hes getting sparked by the king next anyway!

    Comment

    • THe TRiNiTY
      Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 10079
      • 405
      • 103
      • 17,986

      #3
      Though I believe Dirrell won, it was a close fight. Fans will watch that fight and assume that it was close. Most casual knows don't know what they're watching so most might assume that Froch won due to activity and pressing the action, anyway.

      It was a close enough fight that it wasn't a bad call either way, really.

      Comment

      • Pullcounter
        no guts no glory
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 42582
        • 549
        • 191
        • 49,739

        #4
        Originally posted by Rabbit-Punches
        did the controversy of Dirrell/Froch do more harm than good.
        it ruined the tourny format... dirrell and froch should have to fight a rematch in the USA.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP